Imaging before transfer to designated pediatric trauma centers exposes children to excess radiation

BACKGROUND Pediatric trauma patients transferred to pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) often have imaging at the originating hospital (OH). The increased use of computed tomography (CT) raises concerns about malignancy risk from ionizing radiation leading many PTCs to adopt radiation dose reduction strategies. We hypothesized that pediatric trauma patients are exposed to excess radiation from imaging before transfer. METHODS A retrospective review of 1,383 scans was performed on all trauma patients with CT imaging before transfer to our Level I PTC from 2010 to 2014. Demographics, type of imaging, necessity for repeat imaging, appropriateness of imaging, and radiation dose delivered were recorded. Comparative radiation dosing was calculated using the dose-length product (DLP [expressed in mGy-cm]). All CT scans except for CT of the abdomen and pelvis and CT of the head were excluded for complete DLP data issues. Scans were considered clinically appropriate if they met Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) recommendations (ATLS+) and not indicated if they did not meet ATLS criteria (ATLS−). Some scans were repeated because of technical issues. Median &Dgr;DLP represents the difference in dose patients received at OH versus at PTC. RESULTS A total of 673 patients were analyzed. Average age was 11 years, and 65.4% were male. Mean DLP at PTC was 54% lower for all analyzed scans compared with OH (p < 0.0001). DLP at PTC was 51% lower for CT of the abdomen and pelvis and 62% lower for CT of the head. Children received excess dose of 578.62 mGy-cm for scans at OH that were unnecessary. For ATLS+ imaging, children received a median excess of 444.42 mGy-cm of radiation at OH than they would have received had the scans been performed at PTCs using pediatric radiation reduction strategies. CONCLUSION Pediatric trauma imaging performed at transferring institutions often does not adhere to ATLS recommendations and exceeds required ionizing radiation dosages. This study further confirms ATLS recommendations supporting prompt patient transfer without delay for imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.

[1]  Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography , 2018, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies.

[2]  E. Nakashima Radiation Dose Response Estimation with Emphasis on Low Dose Range Using Restricted Cubic Splines: Application to All Solid Cancer Mortality Data, 1950–2003, in Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2015, Health physics.

[3]  D. Preston,et al.  Radiation Effects on Mortality from Solid Cancers Other than Lung, Liver, and Bone Cancer in the Mayak Worker Cohort: 1948–2008 , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  L. Yip,et al.  Systematic screening after Chernobyl: Insights on radiation‐induced thyroid cancer , 2015, Cancer.

[5]  H. Y. Kim,et al.  Radiation dose reduction and image quality in pediatric abdominal CT with kVp and mAs modulation and an iterative reconstruction technique. , 2014, Clinical imaging.

[6]  J. Hong,et al.  Effects of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose reduction and diagnostic accuracy of pediatric abdominal CT , 2014, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  F. Abu-Zidan,et al.  Educational and Clinical Impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Courses: A Systematic Review , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  Melonie P. Heron Deaths: leading causes for 2010. , 2013, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[9]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[10]  Nathan Kuppermann,et al.  Identifying children at very low risk of clinically important blunt abdominal injuries. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  J. Mathews,et al.  Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians , 2013, BMJ.

[12]  A. Flood,et al.  Analysis of radiation exposure among pediatric trauma patients at national trauma centers , 2013, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[13]  Masahiro Ito,et al.  Long‐term trend of thyroid cancer risk among Japanese atomic‐bomb survivors: 60 years after exposure , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[14]  S. Allen,et al.  CT utilization in transferred trauma patients: room for improvement in the modern trauma system. , 2012, The Journal of surgical research.

[15]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[16]  Dawn M. Emick,et al.  Repeat imaging in trauma transfers: A retrospective analysis of computed tomography scans repeated upon arrival to a Level I trauma center , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[17]  A. Cochran,et al.  CT utilization in transferred trauma patients. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[18]  Ashok Panigrahy,et al.  Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[19]  S. Greer,et al.  Inefficiencies in a rural trauma system: the burden of repeat imaging in interfacility transfers. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  Margot C Daugherty,et al.  Unnecessary Imaging, Not Hospital Distance, or Transportation Mode Impacts Delays in the Transfer of Injured Children , 2010, Pediatric emergency care.

[21]  Beverley Newman,et al.  Evaluation of a radiation dose reduction strategy for pediatric chest CT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  R. Jiménez Radiographic Evaluation of the Pediatric Trauma Patient and Ionizing Radiation Exposure , 2010 .

[23]  Vafa Ghaemmaghami,et al.  Trauma: the impact of repeat imaging. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[24]  C. Sivit,et al.  Computed tomography before transfer to a level I pediatric trauma center risks duplication with associated increased radiation exposure. , 2008, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[25]  Julia Costich,et al.  Imaging may delay transfer of rural trauma victims: a survey of referring physicians. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[26]  K. Strauss,et al.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  W. Huda,et al.  Radiation Risk to Children From Computed Tomography , 2007, Pediatrics.

[29]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[30]  D. Frush,et al.  Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. , 2007, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[31]  C. Newgard,et al.  The benefit of higher level of care transfer of injured patients from nontertiary hospital emergency departments. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[32]  J. Lutze,et al.  Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation , 2004, European Radiology.

[33]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.