The Future of Industrial Design Higher Education Driven by Models of Design Thinking and Reasoning

This conceptual paper argues that the future of industrial design education is determined by the ability of design programs to consciously position themselves according to higher education trends. Whether a design program chooses to be part of a scholarly University, or practice-oriented higher education system, depends on the choice of design thinking models and related processes and methods to be taught, researched and practiced. From a design thinking perspective, it can be argued that a positivistic approach towards problem solving is a typical trait of design programs, which have subjected themselves to a University system of research and education. These programs advocate problem solving and participative models of design thinking. Design programs, who are part of a practice-oriented higher education system, tend to support the reflective and hermeneutic design thinking approaches towards designing. However, a common dedication of faculty members towards mentorship and scholarship being able to promote learning and inquiry from a theoretical, collaborative and process perspective is also important, irrelevant what strategy has been adopted.

[1]  Jörn Messeter,et al.  Facilitating collaboration through design games , 2004, PDC 04.

[2]  F. Jackson Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1993 .

[3]  John Taylor Changes in Teaching and Learning in the Period to 2005: The case of postgraduate higher education in the UK , 2002 .

[4]  Cal Swann Nellie is Dead , 2002 .

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[6]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  The Design Experience: The Role of Design and Designers in the Twenty-First Century , 2003 .

[7]  Greg Bamford,et al.  From analysis/synthesis to conjecture/analysis: a review of Karl Popper's influence on design methodology in architecture , 2002 .

[8]  Ulrik Lie,et al.  Framing an eclectic practice; Historical models and narratives of product design as professional work , 2011 .

[9]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[10]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[11]  Melissa Niederhelman Education Through Design , 2001, Design Issues.

[12]  Jane Darke,et al.  The primary Generator and the Design Process , 1979 .

[13]  W. P Lewis,et al.  An analysis of professional skills in design: implications for education and research , 2002 .

[14]  I. Ntshoe Higher education and training policy and practice in South Africa: impacts of global privatisation, quasi-marketisation and new managerialism , 2004 .

[15]  N. Beucker,et al.  RESEARCH SKILLS AS BASIS FOR INDUSTRIAL COLLABORATION IN DESIGN EDUCATION , 2004 .

[16]  L. Shulman,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations, New Developments. , 1999 .

[17]  Hui-Liang Lin An identification and validation of competencies for industrial designers in Taiwan , 1991 .

[18]  Victor J. Papanek,et al.  Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1972 .

[19]  T. Fisher Research in art and design - an un-discipline , 2006 .