Analytic collaboration in virtual innovation projects

Researchers attend to innovation and collaboration issues. Yet, the relevant literature devotes scant attention to the relationship between collaboration effectiveness and virtual innovation team context, while there are clear indications that both subjects relate with growing concerns in today's business setting. This article reviews extant literature and state-of-the art collaboration systems, and elucidate dynamic contextual factors among virtual innovation team members. The results show the antecedents and interrelationship among these factors, suggesting an optimal collaboration model for virtual innovation project teams. This paper documents the empirical observations of a virtual innovation project for advanced textile manufacturing technologies, and examines the due collaboration taking place among different project participants. Understanding the set of contextual factors emerging from virtual innovation projects can help managers classify, and employ the most effective collaboration mechanism for enhancing the corresponding project performance and effectiveness pragmatically.

[1]  Kathryn Cormican,et al.  Supporting systems innovation , 2000 .

[2]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[4]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[5]  Martha Haywood,et al.  Managing virtual teams : practical techniques for high-technology project managers , 1998 .

[6]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Designing and supporting transnational teams: The human resource agenda , 1998 .

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[8]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[9]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[10]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[11]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[12]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[13]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[14]  R. Forrester,et al.  Capturing Learning and Applying Knowledge: An Investigation of the Use of Innovation Teams in Japanese and American Automotive Firms , 2000 .

[15]  D. Merunka,et al.  The impact of brand personality and sales promotions on brand equity , 2011 .

[16]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews , 2003 .

[18]  R. J. Harwood,et al.  Integrating Collaborative Design Processes: Case Studies for Global Fashion Marketplaces , 2000 .

[19]  W. Souder,et al.  An anlysis of the use of extrafunctional information by R&D and marketing personnel: Review and model☆ , 1990 .

[20]  C. Bullard.  Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[21]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  On the theory of virtual organization , 1997 .

[22]  Maria Adenfelt,et al.  The development and sharing of knowledge by Centres of Excellence and transnational teams: A conceptual framework , 2008 .

[23]  J. Pinto,et al.  Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development , 1990 .

[24]  Vipin Gupta,et al.  Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment , 2001 .

[25]  Eva M. Pertusa-Ortega,et al.  Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance? , 2010 .

[26]  P. Goodman.  Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp. , 1992 .

[27]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[28]  J. Stoker,et al.  Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams , 1997 .

[29]  Pierpaolo Andriani,et al.  Managing knowledge associated with innovation , 2003 .

[30]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[31]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[32]  Maria Adenfelt,et al.  Enabling knowledge creation and sharing in transnational projects , 2006 .

[33]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Learning to work in distributed global teams , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Chester K.M. To,et al.  Coordinating dispersed product development processes: A contingency perspective of project design and modelling , 2009 .