A thematic analysis for how patients, prescribers, experts, and patient advocates view the prescription choice process.

BACKGROUND Typically, patients are unaware of the cost consequences regarding prescribing decisions during their clinical encounter and rarely talk with their physicians about costs of prescription drugs. Prescription medications that are deemed by patients to be too costly when the costs become known after purchase are discontinued or used at suboptimal doses compared to prescription medications that are deemed to be worth the cost. OBJECTIVES To learn more about the prescription choice process from several viewpoints, the purpose of this study was to uncover and describe how patients, prescribers, experts, and patient advocates view the prescription choice process. METHODS Data were collected via 9 focus group interviews held between April 24 and July 31, 2007 (3 with patients, 3 with prescribers, 2 with experts, and 1 with patient advocates). The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. The resulting text was analyzed in a descriptive and interpretive manner. Theme extraction was based on convergence and external divergence; that is, identified themes were internally consistent but distinct from one and another. To ensure quality and credibility of analysis, multiple analysts and multiple methods were used to provide a quality check on selective perception and blind interpretive bias that could occur through a single person doing all of the analysis or through employment of a single method. RESULTS The findings revealed 5 overall themes related to the prescription choice process: (1) information, (2) relationship, (3) patient variation, (4) practitioner variation, and (5) role expectations. The results showed that patients, prescribers, experts, and patient advocates viewed the themes within differing contexts. CONCLUSIONS It appears that the prescription choice process entails an interplay among information, relationship, patient variation, practitioner variation, and role expectations, with each viewed within different contexts by individuals engaged in such decision making.

[1]  T. Szasz,et al.  A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of internal medicine.

[2]  D. Taira,et al.  Copayment level and compliance with antihypertensive medication: analysis and policy implications for managed care. , 2006, The American journal of managed care.

[3]  W. Shrank,et al.  Increasing Generic Drug Use in Medicare Part D: The Role of Government , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  M. E. Conway,et al.  Role Theory: Perspectives for Health Professionals , 1978 .

[5]  Steven M. Asch,et al.  The effect of pharmacy benefit design on patient-physician communication about costs , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  P. Liamputtong,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods 2nd ed , 2005 .

[7]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Using Lexical Chains for Text Summarization , 1997 .

[8]  H. P. Edmundson,et al.  New Methods in Automatic Extracting , 1969, JACM.

[9]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[10]  L. Casalino,et al.  Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. , 2003, JAMA.

[11]  J. Groopman,et al.  How Doctors Think , 2007 .

[12]  Thorsten Brants,et al.  TnT – A Statistical Part-of-Speech Tagger , 2000, ANLP.

[13]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Do the incentives in 3-tier pharmaceutical benefit plans operate as intended? Results from a physician leadership survey. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[14]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[15]  M. Patton,et al.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. , 1999, Health services research.

[16]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[17]  John A. Czepiel,et al.  A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions: The service encounter. , 1985 .

[18]  M. Worley.  Testing a pharmacist-patient relationship quality model among older persons with diabetes. , 2006, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[19]  George Karypis,et al.  Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms for Document Datasets , 2005, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[20]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation , 1978 .

[21]  P. Liamputtong.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2005 .

[22]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Doctors Talking With Patients/Patients Talking With Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits , 1992 .

[23]  Roland Soong,et al.  ‘Ask Your Doctor!’ Measuring the effect of direct-to-consumer communications in the world’s largest healthcare market , 2004 .

[24]  Susan L Ettner,et al.  The implications of choice: prescribing generic or preferred pharmaceuticals improves medication adherence for chronic conditions. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  Angel M Jones.  Changes in practice at the nurse-doctor interface. Using focus groups to explore the perceptions of first level nurses working in an acute care setting. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.

[26]  J. Schommer,et al.  Construct identification and measure development for investigating pharmacist-patient relationships. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.