The Flood, the Channels and the Dykes: Managing Legal Information in a Globalized and Digital World

Information search and retrieval are part of daily routines of the legal profession. Lawyers, judges, prosecutors, and legal clerks usually access a number of electronic resources to browse, search, select, or update legal contents. Legal databases have currently become large digital libraries where the tasks related to information-seeking may sometimes be cumbersome. Adding semantics to support information search may provide significant results in terms of efficiency, efficacy, and user satisfaction. Semantic technologies may be able to improve legal information search in the judicial and lawyers' domains. However, legal professionals sometimes prefer following routines than changing their information search behavior. New trends in legal ontologies and Semantic Web technologies may help to improve both professional and laymen's skills.

[1]  R. Smith,et al.  Strategies for coping with information overload , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines , 2004, The Information Society.

[3]  A. C. Martinez,et al.  E-Justice: Using Information Communication Technologies in the Court System , 2009 .

[4]  The Italian Style of E-Justice in a Comparative Perspective , 2009 .

[5]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Challenges of Semantic Knowledge Management , 2009, Semantic Knowledge Management.

[6]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Semantic Knowledge Management: Integrating Ontology Management, Knowledge Discovery, and Human Language Technologies , 2008 .

[7]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Toward a New Generation of Semantic Web Applications , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[8]  G. Urban.  Online Trust and Customer Power: The Emergence of Customer Advocacy , 2008 .

[9]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Technology and Law: The Not So Odd Couple , 2008 .

[10]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law and ICT: State of the Art and Trends in European Research , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[11]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[12]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Concepts and Fields of Relational Justice , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[13]  Johnathan Jenkins.  What Can Information Technology Do for Law , 2008 .

[14]  John Davies,et al.  ICT futures : delivering pervasive, real-time and secure services , 2008 .

[15]  John Domingue,et al.  Near-Term Prospects for Semantic Technologies , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[16]  Enrico Francesconi.  Technologies for European Integration. Standards-Based Interoperability of Legal Information Systems. , 2007 .

[17]  Academic Librarians, Professional Literature, and New Technologies: A Survey. , 2007 .

[18]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Trends in Legal Knowledge. The Semantic Web and the Regulation of Electronic Social Systems , 2007 .

[19]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Bridging the gap between folksonomies and the semantic web: an experience report , 2007 .

[20]  Hélène Bernet,et al.  EUR-Lex: A multilingual on-line website for European Union law , 2006 .

[21]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Next Generation Semantic Web Applications , 2006, ASWC.

[22]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  A Semantic Future for AI , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[23]  R. Studer,et al.  Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems , 2006 .

[24]  Enrico Motta.  Knowledge Publishing and Access on the Semantic Web: A Sociotechnological Analysis , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[25]  Anja Oskamp,et al.  Information Technology & Lawyers: Advanced technology in the legal domain, from challenges to daily routine , 2006 .

[26]  Marc Lauritsen.  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE REAL LEGAL WORKPLACE , 2006 .

[27]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications , 2005, Law and the Semantic Web.

[28]  Arno R. Lodder,et al.  Law firms and IT - Towards optimal knowledge management , 2005 .

[29]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems , 1998, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[30]  André Valente,et al.  Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[31]  Joost Breuker,et al.  Ontologies for Legal Information Serving and Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[32]  Francesco Contini,et al.  Justice and Technology in EUrope: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business , 2001 .

[33]  Anne Morris,et al.  The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the literature , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  David Bawden,et al.  Perspectives on information overload , 1999 .

[35]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Towards a Terminological Clarification , 1995 .

[36]  J. Breuker,et al.  Ontologies, the missing link between legal theory and AI and Law , 1994 .

[37]  D. Lieberman,et al.  The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain , 1990 .

[38]  Conclusions , 1989 .

[39]  J. Goody.  The Domestication of the Savage Mind , 1982 .