Precis of saving truth from paradox
暂无分享,去创建一个
1. It is traditional to begin a study of the semantic paradoxes by focusing on a version of the Liar Paradox involving a sentence W that "asserts its own falsity": more precisely, one where the equivalence between the sentence W and the sentence False( ) can be established by quite uncontroversial means. And it is traditionally noted that naive assumptions about truth (viz., the Tarski biconditional True( ) )~ False( ). (1)
[1] Graham Priest,et al. Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent , 1990 .
[2] N. Belnap,et al. The Revision Theory of Truth , 1993 .