A Stochastic Process Model for Free Agency under Indeterminism

Abstract The aim of this paper is to establish that free agency, which is a capacity of many animals including human beings, is compatible with indeterminism: an indeterministic world allows for the existence of free agency. The question of the compatibility of free agency and indeterminism is less discussed than its mirror image, the question of the compatibility of free agency and determinism. It is, however, of great importance for our self‐conception as free agents in our (arguably) indeterministic world. We begin by explicating the notions of indeterminism and free agency and by clarifying the interrelation of free agency and the human‐specific notion of free will. We then situate our claim of the compatibility of free agency and indeterminism precisely in the landscape of the current debate on freedom and determinism, exposing an unhappy asymmetry in that debate. Then we proceed to make our case by describing the mathematically precise, physically motivated model of projective simulation, which employs indeterminism as a central resource for agency modeling. We argue that an indeterministic process of deliberation modeled by the dynamics of projective simulation can exemplify free agency under indeterminism, thereby establishing our compatibility claim: Free agency can develop and thrive in an indeterministic world.

[1]  G. Zachmann,et al.  Stochastic methods , 2020, Cross-Layer Reliability of Computing Systems.

[2]  N. Mukunda,et al.  The Character of Physical Law , 2018 .

[3]  E. Anscombe.  Causality and Determination , 2018 .

[4]  T. Müller,et al.  Defining Determinism , 2018, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[5]  Justus H. Piater,et al.  Skill Learning by Autonomous Robotic Playing using Active Learning and Creativity , 2017, ArXiv.

[6]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Antonio Acín,et al.  Certified randomness in quantum physics , 2016, Nature.

[8]  Antje Rumberg.  Transitions toward a Semantics for Real Possibility , 2016 .

[9]  C. Werndl.  Determinism and Indeterminism , 2016 .

[10]  Hans-J. Briegel,et al.  Quantum-enhanced machine learning , 2016, Physical review letters.

[11]  Justus H. Piater,et al.  Robotic playing for hierarchical complex skill learning , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[12]  Hans-J. Briegel,et al.  Meta-learning within Projective Simulation , 2016, IEEE Access.

[13]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[14]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Why Bohmian Mechanics? One- and Two-Time Position Measurements, Bell Inequalities, Philosophy, and Physics , 2015, Entropy.

[15]  Hans-J. Briegel,et al.  A Chance for Attributable Agency , 2015, Minds and Machines.

[16]  Hans-J. Briegel,et al.  Projective simulation with generalization , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Thomas Müller,et al.  Time and Determinism , 2015, J. Philos. Log..

[18]  David Palmer.  Libertarian free will : contemporary debates , 2014 .

[19]  R. Kane.  New Arguments in Debates on Libertarian Free Will , 2014 .

[20]  Vedran Dunjko,et al.  Quantum speedup for active learning agents , 2014, 1401.4997.

[21]  H. Steward.  A Metaphysics for Freedom , 2012 .

[22]  T. Müller.  Branching in the landscape of possibilities , 2012, Synthese.

[23]  J. Fischer.  Deep Control: Essays on Free Will and Value , 2011 .

[24]  C. Franklin.  Farewell to the luck (and Mind) argument , 2011 .

[25]  Jonathan P Bacon,et al.  Animal escapology II: escape trajectory case studies , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Hans J. Briegel,et al.  Projective simulation for artificial intelligence , 2011, Scientific Reports.

[27]  C. Werndl.  On the observational equivalence of continuous-time deterministic and indeterministic descriptions , 2011, 1310.1620.

[28]  M. Eddon.  Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality , 2011 .

[29]  B. Brembs.  Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  R. F. Werner,et al.  Maximal violation of Bell inequalities by position measurements , 2009, 0912.3740.

[31]  G. Keil.  Willensfreiheit , 2009 .

[32]  Jason S. Miller.  Four Views on Free Will , 2009 .

[33]  Robert Young,et al.  An Essay on Free Will , 2009 .

[34]  J. Bacon,et al.  Cockroaches Keep Predators Guessing by Using Preferred Escape Trajectories , 2008, Current Biology.

[35]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Alfred R. Mele,et al.  FREE WILL AND LUCK , 2007 .

[37]  A. Einstein.  Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen [AdP 17, 549 (1905)] , 2005, Annalen der Physik.

[38]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Facing the future , 2003, 2003 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.03CH37443).

[39]  Gordon Pettit,et al.  Living Without Free Will , 2002 .

[40]  A. Mele.  Ultimate Responsibility and Dumb Luck , 1999, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[41]  J. Fischer,et al.  Review: Précis of Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility , 1998 .

[42]  M. J. Osler.  Laws and symmetry , 1993 .

[43]  P. Guttorp,et al.  The Taming of Chance. , 1992 .

[44]  S. Brison.  The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[45]  S. Starkie.  Free will , 1985, Nature.

[46]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  I Could Not Have Done Otherwise-So What? , 1984 .

[47]  D. Sherrington.  Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[48]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Communication theory of secrecy systems , 1949, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[49]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[50]  Jessica Fuerst,et al.  Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten , 1911, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1. Aufl.). Prolegomena. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft.

[51]  Justus H. Piater,et al.  Autonomous robots: potential, advances and future direction , 2017 .

[52]  C. Wuthrich.  Can the world be shown to be indeterministic after all , 2010 .

[53]  John Earman,et al.  ASPECTS OF DETERMINISM IN MODERN PHYSICS , 2007 .

[54]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[55]  David M. Ciocchi.  The Significance of Free Will , 1999 .

[56]  G. Strawson,et al.  The impossibility of moral responsibility , 1994 .

[57]  John Earman,et al.  A Primer on Determinism , 1986 .

[58]  Donald Davidson,et al.  On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme , 1973 .

[59]  P. Strawson.  Freedom and Resentment , 1962 .

[60]  T. G.,et al.  Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy , 1934, Nature.

[61]  R. E. Hobart,et al.  Free will as involving determination and inconceivable without it , 1934 .