Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Fast breathhold cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become a reference standard for the measurement of cardiac volumes, function, and mass. The implications of this for sample sizes for remodeling studies in heart failure (HF) have not been elucidated. We determined the reproducibility of CMR in HF and calculated the sample size requirements and compared them with published values for echocardiography. Breathhold gradient echo cines of the left ventricle were acquired in 20 patients with HF and 20 normal subjects. Sample size values were calculated from the interstudy standard deviation of the difference. The percentage variability of the measured parameters in our HF group of intraobserver (2.0-7.4%), interobserver (3.3-7.7%), and interstudy (2.5-4.8%) measurements was slightly larger than for our normal group (1.6-6.6%, 1.6-7.3%, and 2.0-7.3%, respectively) but remained comparable with previous studies in normal subjects. The calculated sample sizes in patients with HF for CMR to detect a 10-ml change in end-diastolic volume (n = 12) and end-systolic volume (n = 10), a 3% change in ejection fraction (n = 15), and a 10-g change in mass was (n = 9) were substantially smaller than recently published values for two-dimensional echocardiography (reduction of 81-97%). Breathhold CMR is a fast comprehensive technique for the assessment of cardiac volumes, function, and mass in HF that is accurate but also highly reproducible. This allows a considerable reduction in the patient numbers required to prove a hypothesis in research studies, which suggests a potential for important research cost savings.

[1]  S. Nelson,et al.  Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breath-hold cine MR imaging. , 1993, Radiology.

[2]  D. Pennell,et al.  Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echocardiography. , 2000, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  G. Kronik,et al.  Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. , 1979, Circulation.

[4]  H. Hecht,et al.  Reproducibility of equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease: response of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion to supine bicycle exercise. , 1982, American heart journal.

[5]  J. Allison,et al.  Measurement of left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using MRI: comparison with echocardiography. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  N. Markandu,et al.  Measurement of left ventricular mass in man. , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[7]  C. Higgins,et al.  Interstudy reproducibility of dimensional and functional measurements between cine magnetic resonance studies in the morphologically abnormal left ventricle. , 1990, American heart journal.

[8]  C Thomsen,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes by magnetic resonance in comparison with radionuclide angiography, contrast angiography and echocardiography. , 1992, European heart journal.

[9]  R Beyar,et al.  Determination of left ventricular mass by magnetic resonance imaging in hearts deformed by acute infarction. , 1989, Circulation.

[10]  I. Holme,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function. , 1997, European heart journal.

[11]  G. Lamas,et al.  Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  I Schnittger,et al.  Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  V L Morgan,et al.  Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[14]  D J Pennell,et al.  Establishment and performance of a magnetic resonance cardiac function clinic. , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[15]  D J Pennell,et al.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? , 2000, European heart journal.

[16]  R Gorlin,et al.  Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  R. Edelman,et al.  Cineangiography of the heart in a single breath hold with a segmented turboFLASH sequence. , 1991, Radiology.

[18]  R W Parkey,et al.  Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[19]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  G. Reboldi,et al.  Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. , 1998, Circulation.

[21]  A de Roos,et al.  Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. , 1993, Radiology.

[22]  S. Keteyian,et al.  Reverse remodeling in heart failure with intensification of vasodilator therapy , 1997, Clinical cardiology.

[23]  Leon Axel,et al.  Global cardiac function using fast breath‐hold MRI: Validation of new acquisition and analysis techniques , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  D. Pennell,et al.  Left ventricular quantification in heart failure by cardiovascular MR using prospective respiratory navigator gating: Comparison with breath‐hold acquisition , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  D. N. Firmin,et al.  DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN STUDIES OF THE HEART , 1985, The Lancet.

[26]  E Tomei,et al.  Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[27]  C B Higgins,et al.  Which standard has the gold? , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  R M Peshock,et al.  Left ventricular volumes measured by MR imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[29]  G. Germano,et al.  Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  R G Gould,et al.  Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[31]  J. Gottdiener,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging compared to echocardiography to assess left ventricular mass in the hypertensive patient. , 1995, American journal of hypertension.