From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes

Abstract Competition with other players or with the game itself is one of the basic elements of videogames, but the fine balance between increased mental effort and potential motivational benefits has to be addressed. A quantitative experiment was conducted to verify if social competition increases cognitive load, engagement, interest, and subsequently learning. The 115 students played an educational videogame, specifically designed for this experiment using Minecraf t, in single, one-versus-one, small group, or classroom settings. The results show significantly higher cognitive load induced through social competition; lowered focused attention, instructional efficiency; and no higher situational interest. Additionally, increased learning in the solo condition could be observed. In contrast to these results, analysis of the actual perceived challenge resulted in positive correlations with engagement, situational interest, and retention knowledge. After the analysis, a detailed discussion of the impacts of social competition and various implications and future directions are provided. For example, it is argued that it is important to distinguish between the added gameplay mechanic of social competition and the perceived intrapersonal challenge this induces. Whereas the first might increase cognitive load due to the monitoring of additional game states, the latter might foster motivation and interest.

[1]  Robert Rueda,et al.  Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  I. Sarason,et al.  Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Fu-Yun Yu,et al.  The Mediating Effects of Anonymity and Proximity in an Online Synchronized Competitive Learning Environment , 2003 .

[6]  B. Homer,et al.  Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations , 2006 .

[7]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  Situational Interest and Academic Achievement in the Active-Learning Classroom. , 2011 .

[8]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[9]  Wilfried Admiraal,et al.  The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Richard N. Van Eck,et al.  The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills a computer-based instructional simulation game , 2002 .

[11]  Steve Nebel,et al.  Mining Learning and Crafting Scientific Experiments: A Literature Review on the Use of Minecraft in Education and Research , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Measuring Situational Interest in Academic Domains , 2010 .

[13]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Third Edition , 2014 .

[14]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[15]  Pieter Wouters,et al.  Learner Performance in Multimedia Learning Arrangements: An Analysis Across Instructional Approaches , 2009 .

[16]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[17]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  V. Komis,et al.  Learning outcomes and processes in massively multiplayer online games: exploring the perceptions of players , 2013, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[19]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Design guidelines for Classroom Multiplayer Presential Games (CMPG) , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[20]  A. Tesser.  Reproductions Supplied by Edrs Are the Best That Can Be Made * * from the Original Document. toward a Self-evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior* , 2007 .

[21]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition , 2003, ICEC.

[22]  Zhi-Hong Chen,et al.  Learning Preferences and Motivation of Different Ability Students for Social-Competition or Self-Competition , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  D. Kort,et al.  D3.3 : Game Experience Questionnaire:development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games , 2007 .

[24]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[25]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Making cooperative learning work , 1999 .

[26]  Casper Harteveld,et al.  Triadic Game Design - Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play , 2011 .

[27]  Ya-Ling Wu,et al.  An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in Web-based learning , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Ernest Adams,et al.  Fundamentals of Game Design , 2006 .

[29]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Competition and students’ perceptions in a game-based language learning environment , 2013 .

[30]  David Kirschner,et al.  Measuring Video Game Engagement Through Gameplay Reviews , 2014 .

[31]  Sema A. Kalaian,et al.  Small-Group vs. Competitive Learning in Computer Science Classrooms: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2015 .

[32]  A Meta-Analytic Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Methods on Statistics Achievement , 2014 .

[33]  Karin A. Orvis,et al.  The impeding role of initial unrealistic goal-setting on videogame-based training performance: Identifying underpinning processes and a solution , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research , 2008 .

[35]  Avishalom Tor,et al.  Ranks and Rivals: A Theory of Competition , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[36]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Combining cognitive and affective support in order to promote learning , 2009 .

[37]  Hercy N. H. Cheng,et al.  Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Zhi-Hong Chen,et al.  Exploring students' behaviors in a competition-driven educational game , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works , 1998 .

[40]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  A Model to Support the Design of Multiplayer Games , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[41]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[42]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. , 1984 .

[43]  Eric Wiebe,et al.  Measuring Video Game Engagement Through the Cognitive and Affective Dimensions , 2014 .

[44]  Gregory Trefry,et al.  Casual Game Design: Designing Play for the Gamer in ALL of Us , 2010 .

[45]  Wei Peng,et al.  Does it matter with whom you slay? The effects of competition, cooperation and relationship type among video game players , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  V. Aleven,et al.  Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments , 2014 .

[47]  Erol Özçelik,et al.  The effect of competition on learning in games , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Geertje Bekebrede,et al.  Learning in Single-Versus Multiplayer Games: The More the Merrier? , 2011 .

[49]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[50]  Jesper Juul,et al.  The game, the player, the world: looking for a heart of gameness , 2010, DiGRA Conference.

[51]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[52]  Jesse Schell,et al.  The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses , 2019 .

[53]  Barbara L. Grabowski,et al.  Gameplaying for maths learning: cooperative or not? , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[54]  Benjamin A. Clegg,et al.  Measuring Game Engagement , 2014 .

[55]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learner vs. System Control in Using Online Support for Simulation-based Discovery Learning , 2001 .

[56]  H. Markus,et al.  The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test , 1978 .

[57]  R. Mayer.  Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning , 2014 .

[58]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Comparison Of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, And Individualistic Learning , 1986 .

[59]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive consequences of making computer-based learning activities more game-like , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  Günter Daniel Rey,et al.  Goal-Setting in Educational Video Games , 2017 .

[61]  Avishalom Tor,et al.  Rankings, Standards, and Competition: Task vs. Scale Comparisons , 2007 .

[62]  Elizabeth O. Hayward,et al.  The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation , 2013 .

[63]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development , 2006 .

[64]  J. Jansz,et al.  THE GAME EXPERIENCE , 2008 .

[65]  Mu Wu,et al.  No One Likes to Lose , 2014, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[66]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  Competitive versus cooperative exergame play for African American adolescents' executive function skills: short-term effects in a long-term training intervention. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[67]  Erol Özçelik,et al.  The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[68]  Avishalom Tor,et al.  The N-Effect , 2009, Psychological science.