Modelling of force production in skeletal muscle undergoing stretch.

Many human movements involve eccentric contraction of muscles. Therefore, it is important that a theoretical model is able to represent the kinetic response of activated muscle during lengthening if it is to be applied to dynamic simulation of such movements. The so-called Hill and Distribution Moment models are two commonly used models of skeletal muscle. The Hill model is a phenomenological model based on experimental observations; the Distribution Moment model is based on the cross-bridge theory of muscle contraction. The ability of each of these models to predict the force-velocity relation has been considered previously; however, few attempts have been made to evaluate the force response of each model with respect to time during stretches at different velocities. The purpose of this study was to compare the predicted force-time responses of the Hill and Distribution Moment models to the actual force produced by the cat soleus during experimental iso-velocity stretches at maximal activation. Two stretch velocities were simulated: 7.2 and 400 mm s-1. Model parameters were derived from the literature where possible. In addition, model parameters were optimized to provide the best possible fit between model force predictions and experimental results at each velocity. The results of the study showed that using the Hill model, it was possible to describe qualitatively the force-time response of the muscle at both velocities of stretch using parameters derived from the literature. It was also possible to optimize a set of parameters for the Hill model to provide a quantitative description of the force-time response at each velocity. Using the Distribution Moment model, it was not possible to describe the force-time response of the muscle for both velocities using a single set of rate constants, suggesting that the cross-bridge theory, upon which the model is based, may have to be further evaluated for lengthening muscle. Further research is required to determine if the model results can be generalized to other muscles and other velocities of stretch.

[1]  G. Zahalak,et al.  Muscle activation and contraction: constitutive relations based directly on cross-bridge kinetics. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M Solomonow,et al.  The effect of tendon on muscle force in dynamic isometric contractions: a simulation study. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F E Zajac,et al.  Muscle coordination of movement: a perspective. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R Greenwood,et al.  Landing from an unexpected fall and a voluntary step. , 1976, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Muscle architecture and force-velocity characteristics of cat soleus and medial gastrocnemius: implications for motor control. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  P. Rack,et al.  The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  W. Garrett Muscle strain injuries: clinical and basic aspects. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  B. Walmsley,et al.  Comparison of stiffness of soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscles in cats. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Zahalak A comparison of the mechanical behavior of the cat soleus muscle with a distribution-moment model. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  P A Huijing,et al.  Properties of the tendinous structures and series elastic component of EDL muscle-tendon complex of the rat. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  W Herzog,et al.  Myofilament lengths of cat skeletal muscle: theoretical considerations and functional implications. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  The Relationship between body mass and the capacity for storage of elastic strain energy in mammalian limb tendons , 1991 .

[14]  A. Voloshin,et al.  An in vivo study of low back pain and shock absorption in the human locomotor system. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  A. Huxley,et al.  Proposed Mechanism of Force Generation in Striated Muscle , 1971, Nature.

[17]  D. Morgan Separation of active and passive components of short-range stiffness of muscle. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[18]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Morgan New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[20]  F. W. Flitney,et al.  Cross‐bridge detachment and sarcomere 'give' during stretch of active frog's muscle. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[22]  G. Zahalak,et al.  A distribution-moment model of energetics in skeletal muscle. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  K. Edman,et al.  Redistribution of sarcomere length during isometric contraction of frog muscle fibres and its relation to tension creep. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Winters Hill-Based Muscle Models: A Systems Engineering Perspective , 1990 .

[25]  N C Heglund,et al.  Cross-bridge cycling theories cannot explain high-speed lengthening behavior in frog muscle. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[26]  D L Morgan,et al.  Intersarcomere dynamics during fixed‐end tetanic contractions of frog muscle fibres. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  G. Zahalak A distribution-moment approximation for kinetic theories of muscular contraction , 1981 .

[28]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  Isotonic lengthening and shortening movements of cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.