Modeling Inter‐Subject Variability in fMRI Activation Location: A Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Model

The aim of this article is to develop a spatial model for multi-subject fMRI data. There has been extensive work on univariate modeling of each voxel for single and multi-subject data, some work on spatial modeling of single-subject data, and some recent work on spatial modeling of multi-subject data. However, there has been no work on spatial models that explicitly account for inter-subject variability in activation locations. In this article, we use the idea of activation centers and model the inter-subject variability in activation locations directly. Our model is specified in a Bayesian hierarchical framework which allows us to draw inferences at all levels: the population level, the individual level, and the voxel level. We use Gaussian mixtures for the probability that an individual has a particular activation. This helps answer an important question that is not addressed by any of the previous methods: What proportion of subjects had a significant activity in a given region. Our approach incorporates the unknown number of mixture components into the model as a parameter whose posterior distribution is estimated by reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. We demonstrate our method with a fMRI study of resolving proactive interference and show dramatically better precision of localization with our method relative to the standard mass-univariate method. Although we are motivated by fMRI data, this model could easily be modified to handle other types of imaging data.

[1]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Mixture models with adaptive spatial regularization for segmentation with an application to FMRI data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[3]  Karsten Tabelow,et al.  Analyzing fMRI experiments with structural adaptive smoothing procedures , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[5]  Xu Chen,et al.  Bayesian Kernel Methods for Analysis of Functional Neuroimages , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Exact MAP Activity Detection in f MRI Using a GLM with an Ising Spatial Prior , 2004, MICCAI.

[7]  Brian Caffo,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical framework for spatial modeling of fMRI data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  Jörg Polzehl,et al.  Functional and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using vector adaptive weights smoothing , 2001 .

[9]  N. Hartvig,et al.  A Stochastic Geometry Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Images , 2002 .

[10]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[11]  P. Green,et al.  Modelling spatially correlated data via mixtures: a Bayesian approach , 2002 .

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Combining Images Across Multiple Subjects , 2002 .

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[15]  P. Morosan,et al.  Human Primary Auditory Cortex: Cytoarchitectonic Subdivisions and Mapping into a Spatial Reference System , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[17]  Marc G. Berman,et al.  Neural mechanisms of proactive interference-resolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[20]  P. Green,et al.  Corrigendum: On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components , 1997 .

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  William D. Penny,et al.  Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis function priors , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[25]  Xavier Descombes,et al.  Spatio-temporal fMRI analysis using Markov random fields , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  T. Johnson Analysis of Pulsatile Hormone Concentration Profiles with Nonconstant Basal Concentration: A Bayesian Approach , 2007, Biometrics.

[27]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  P. Green,et al.  On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components (with discussion) , 1997 .

[29]  Guillaume Flandin,et al.  Bayesian comparison of spatially regularised general linear models , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[30]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  N V Hartvig,et al.  Spatial mixture modeling of fMRI data , 2000, Human brain mapping.