A Systematic Approach For Kinematic Design Of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeletons

Kinematic structure of an exoskeleton is the most fundamental block of its design and is determinant of many functional capabilities of it. Although numerous upper limb rehabilitation devices have been designed in the recent years, there is not a framework that can systematically guide the kinematic design procedure. Additionally, diversity of currently available devices and the many minute details incorporated to address certain design requirements hinders pinpointing the core kinematics of the available devices to compare them against each other. This makes the review of literature for identifying drawbacks of the state of the art systems a challenging and puzzling task. In fact, lack of a unifying framework makes designing rehabilitation devices an intuitive process and prone to biases from currently available designs. This research work proposes a systematic approach for kinematic design of upper limb rehabilitation exoskeletons based on conceptual design techniques. Having defined a solution neutral problem statement based on the characteristics of an ideal device, the main functionality of the system is divided into smaller functional units via the Functional Decomposition Method. Various directions for concept generation are explored and finally, it has been shown that a vast majority of the current exoskeleton designs fit within the proposed design framework and the defined functionalities.

[1]  C. Carignan,et al.  Design of an arm exoskeleton with scapula motion for shoulder rehabilitation , 2005, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005..

[2]  Anis Sahbani,et al.  Robotic Exoskeletons: A Perspective for the Rehabilitation of Arm Coordination in Stroke Patients , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  IntelliArm: An exoskeleton for diagnosis and treatment of patients with neurological impairments , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[4]  Reza Langari,et al.  Design and kinematic analysis of a novel upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[5]  Reza Langari,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities in Exoskeleton-based Rehabilitation , 2017, ArXiv.

[6]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin III --arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation , 2009 .

[9]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Dampace: Design of an Exoskeleton for Force-Coordination Training in Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation , 2009 .

[10]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin II - 7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  P. Letier,et al.  SAM : A 7-DOF portable arm exoskeleton with local joint control , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Kazuo Kiguchi,et al.  SUEFUL-7: A 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  A. U. Pehlivan,et al.  Current Trends in Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Promoting Patient Engagement in Therapy , 2014, Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.

[14]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Robert Riener,et al.  A robotic system to train activities of daily living in a virtual environment , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  A.H.A. Stienen,et al.  Dampace: dynamic force-coordination trainer for the upper extremities , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[18]  Reza Langari,et al.  TAMU CLEVERarm: A novel exoskeleton for rehabilitation of upper limb impairments , 2017, 2017 International Symposium on Wearable Robotics and Rehabilitation (WeRob).

[19]  Damien Motte A review of the fundamentals of the systematic engineering design process models , 2008 .

[20]  Kathleen O'Shaughnessy,et al.  A systematic approach to conceptual engineering design , 1991 .