Efficacy of new filter suction to decrease the rate of occlusion and total suction time in a simulated total hip replacement operation

Background During orthopedic operations, such as total hip replacement or total knee replacement, there is a lot of bone debris from bone cutting and reaming that commonly causes surgical suction devices to occlude many times, which can prolong the operative time and increase the amount of bleeding for the patient. Materials and methods We developed a surgical filter suction system that we call the VY suction tube. The suction tube assembly consists of a tube filter within a housing assembly. The filter pore size was designed to prevent tissue or bone debris from passing through the filter, though it allows fluid to pass through. A simulated total hip replacement operation was performed to test the efficacy of this new suction device when compared with two other types of tube suction devices. Results The VY suction tube showed that the mean duration to remove all fluid from a simulated field was significantly shorter than the Pool suction tube (P=0.0009) and Frazier suction tube (P=0.0012). The study also showed that the VY suction tube has a lower rate of occlusion when compared with the Pool suction tube (P≤0.0001) and Frazier suction tube (P≤0.0001). Conclusion Our new suction tube design shows good efficacy when removing fluid and debris from a simulated operative field. However, further studies in real clinical settings are needed.

[1]  M. Inacio,et al.  Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R. Hornung,et al.  Risk Factors Associated With Surgical Site Infection After Pediatric Posterior Spinal Fusion Procedure , 2009, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[3]  M. Malangoni,et al.  Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. , 2008, Surgery.

[4]  A. Charlett,et al.  Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data. , 2006, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  R. Laskin,et al.  Prolonged Operative Time Correlates with Increased Infection Rate After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, HSS Journal.

[6]  W. Puhl,et al.  Influence of operation duration on perioperative morbidity in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[7]  R. Laskin,et al.  Infection in Total Knee Replacement: A Retrospective Review of 6489 Total Knee Replacements , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  C. Mazel,et al.  [Perioperative complications after total hip revision surgery and their predictive factors. A series of 181 consecutive procedures]. , 2001, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[9]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[10]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[12]  W J Martone,et al.  Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.