The relationship between fractal properties of solid matrix and pore space in porous media

Abstract Measuring fractal dimensions has become a common practice for describing structural properties of porous media. Depending on the object of interest, different features of the structure can be measured: solid matrix, pores, and the interface between them. However, when measuring the fractal dimension of all these features, the question arises whether these dimensions are independent from each other or whether they can be related to an underlying property of the structure or image, respectively. For a variety of porous media we measured the fractal dimension of the matrix, the pore space, and the interface between them simultaneously using the box counting method. Analyzed images were obtained from soil thin sections and a void system in a clayey soil. Measured fractal dimensions were compared with fractal dimensions estimated by the pore-solid fractal (PSF) model, which derives the fractal properties of the matrix and the pore space completely as a function of the porosity, the size of the initiator and the fractal dimension of the interface. Measured results agree well with values obtained from the PSF model. A clear relationship between the fractal dimensions of the two phases (solid matrix and pore space) of a porous medium and their interface was observed. For all images the smallest fractal dimension was found for the interface between matrix and pores. Values for the fractal dimension of the two phases were between those for the interface and the Euclidian space with the phase with the lower mass fraction always having the smaller dimension. Porosity was found to act as weighing factor linking the dimension of the phases to those of the interface and Euclidian space. Model results also predict a dependency of the dimension of the phases on the spatial resolution of the analyzed image. For images having a high resolution (compared to the size of the initiator) phase dimensions are expected to be greater than for images having a low resolution.

[1]  E. Perfect,et al.  Multifractal Model for Soil Aggregate Fragmentation , 1993 .

[2]  S. Tarafdar,et al.  Fractal pore structure of sedimentary rocks: Simulation by ballistic deposition , 2003 .

[3]  Yakov A. Pachepsky,et al.  Fractal parameters of pore surfaces as derived from micromorphological data: effect of long-term management practices , 1996 .

[4]  S. Eins.  Special Approaches of Image Analysis to the Measurement of Fractal Dimension , 1998 .

[5]  J.-Y. Parlange,et al.  Fractals in soil science , 1998 .

[6]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Dependence of the surface fractal dimension of soil pores on image resolution and magnification , 2003 .

[7]  John W. Crawford,et al.  The fractal structure of soil aggregates: its measurement and interpretation , 1991 .

[8]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Fractals and fragmentation , 1986 .

[9]  C. Sparrow.  The Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[10]  Garrison Sposito,et al.  Fractal Fragmentation, Soil Porosity, and Soil Water Properties: I. Theory , 1991 .

[11]  N. Bird,et al.  The pore–solid fractal model of soil density scaling , 2003 .

[12]  Edith Perrier,et al.  Generalizing the fractal model of soil structure : the pore-solid fractal approach , 1999 .

[13]  F. Bartoli,et al.  Structure and self‐similarity in silty and sandy soils: the fractal approach , 1991 .

[14]  E. Perfect,et al.  Water retention of prefractal porous media generated with the homogeneous and heterogeneous algorithms , 2001 .

[15]  John W. Crawford,et al.  The distribution of anoxic volume in a fractal model of soil , 1999 .

[16]  Russell Reeve,et al.  A warning about standard errors when estimating the fractal dimension , 1992 .

[17]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  A numerical experiment on pore size, pore connectivity, water retention, permeability, and solute transport using network models , 2000 .

[18]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Percolation Theory and Network Modeling Applications in Soil Physics , 1998 .

[19]  J. Crawford,et al.  Heterogeneity of the pore and solid volume of soil: Distinguishing a fractal space from its non-fractal complement , 1996 .

[20]  N. Bird,et al.  Water retention models for fractal soil structures , 1996 .

[21]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Soil Mass, Surface, and Spectral Fractal Dimensions Estimated from Thin Section Photographs , 1996 .

[22]  John W. Crawford,et al.  On the relation between number-size distributions and the fractal dimension of aggregates , 1993 .

[23]  Gerhard Gerold,et al.  The surface fractal dimension of the soil–pore interface as measured by image analysis , 2001 .

[24]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  Fractal dimensions for volume and surface of interaggregate pores — scale effects , 1997 .

[25]  F. Bartoli,et al.  The relation between silty soil structures and their mercury porosimetry curve counterparts: fractals and percolation , 1999 .

[26]  A. McBratney,et al.  On Diffusion in Fractal Soil Structures , 2000 .

[27]  A. Papritz,et al.  A Fractal Approach to Model Soil Structure and to Calculate Thermal Conductivity of Soils , 2003 .

[28]  E. Perfect,et al.  An Improved Fractal Equation for The Soil Water Retention Curve , 1996 .

[29]  J. Niemeyer,et al.  The fractal dimension of the pore‐volume inside soils , 1989 .

[30]  R. Allmaras,et al.  Mass, surface, and fragmentation fractal dimensions of soil fragments produced by tillage , 1998 .

[31]  Scott W. Tyler,et al.  Fractal processes in soil water retention , 1990 .

[32]  E. Weibel,et al.  Fractals in Biology and Medicine , 1994 .