The governance of scientific assessment in the context of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change : lessons for international cooperation in science, technology and innovation

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been an example of an effective science-policy interface in international environmental affairs. For its efforts “to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change,” the Panel was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007. The discussion paper outlines the main characteristics of the IPCC’s governance framework in relation to: institutional structure and decision-making; the assessment process; communication of assessment findings and outreach activities; the role of the IPCC in policymaking; as well as its role in capacity-building work. In doing so, it reflects the reforms made by the Panel between 2010 and 2012 in response to the external review of its processes and procedures called for after errors were found in the Fourth Assessment Report. The paper concludes with an overview of strengths and weaknesses of the IPCC model which may be useful for other multilateral research-related initiatives.

[1]  M. Furness.  Let's Get Comprehensive: European Union Engagement in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Countries , 2014 .

[2]  Nannette Lindenberg.  Public Instruments to Leverage Private Capital for Green Investments in Developing Countries , 2014 .

[3]  H. Janus.  Real Innovation or Second-Best Solution? First Experiences from Results-Based Aid for Fiscal Decentralisation in Ghana and Tanzania , 2014 .

[4]  Georgeta Vidican,et al.  Achieving Inclusive Competitiveness in the Emerging Solar Energy Sector in Morocco , 2013 .

[5]  Karina Mross,et al.  Struggling for stability: international support for peace and democracy in post-civil war Nepal , 2013 .

[6]  Timo Mahn,et al.  Country-Level Aid Coordination at the United Nations: Taking the Resident Coordinator System Forward , 2013 .

[7]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[8]  J. Depledge.  Crafting the Copenhagen Consensus: Some Reflections , 2008 .

[9]  Jennifer Phillips,et al.  Communication and Mental Processes: Experimental and Analytic Processing of Uncertain Climate Information , 2007 .

[10]  J. Depledge,et al.  The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures , 2005 .

[11]  Shardul Agrawala,et al.  Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 1998 .

[12]  D. Tirpak,et al.  Framework agreement on climate change: a scientific and policy history , 1995 .

[13]  E. Pietschmann.  Forgotten or unpromising? : The elusive phenomenon of under-aided countries, sectors and sub-national regions , 2014 .

[14]  Clara Brandi,et al.  Different Perspectives on Differentiated Responsibilities , 2014 .

[15]  Gerd Schönwälder.  Promoting democracy : what role for the democratic emerging powers? , 2014 .

[16]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[17]  C. Forner,et al.  Science-Policy Interaction: Challenges for Ensuring a Credible Climate Change Regime , 2006 .

[18]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .