Mix-Design with Low Bearing Capacity Materials

The roadway construction requirements for soils are generally fixed by Standards. The most common constraints involving materials are optimum moisture content (OMC), maximum dry density (MDD) and bearing capacity predictable by using Proctor test and California bearing ratio (CBR) test. These traditional tests can be combined with other simple field tests to gain the maximum density. However, the use of low bearing materials such as clay and silt, and local resources is an important means of simplifying and economizing the road-building still further. The main purpose of this experimental analysis is a procedure to characterize some road materials by its bearing capacity (CBR and MDD) from two simple standard tests (Sieve Analysis and Atterberg Limits), and then a method to employ silt and/or clay in road mixture. The planned method suggests the minimal volume of high quality material in the roadway mixture added to silt and clay, that must be available in the analyzed location, obtaining an ideal bearing capacity. Different soil-types from various quarries and digs located in Southern Italy were used. The classic laboratory tests to assess the soil properties of all amassed study-soils were carried out, i.e., the Atterberg limits and grain-size distribution (GSD). Correlations based on linear regression were then performed to determine the optimal combination of the properties measured with dependent CBR variables and maximum dry density (MDD) to be predicted for low-volume roads. These equations were then validated by using four material-types from outside the calibration sample.

[1]  Gianluca Dell’Acqua,et al.  Safety Performance Functions for Low-Volume Roads , 2011 .

[2]  Hussain A. Khalid,et al.  Deformation Properties of Untreated and Enzyme-Treated Bottom Ash Waste for Use in Foundations , 2009 .

[3]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  Use of Recycled and Waste Materials in Indiana , 2004 .

[4]  Gianluca Dell’Acqua,et al.  Road Performance Evaluation Using Geometric Consistency and Pavement Distress Data , 2011 .

[5]  Skirmantas Skrinskas,et al.  Analysis of Lithuanian Gravel Roads Paving Programme Implementation in 1998–2005 , 2006 .

[6]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Creating Synthetic Household Populations , 2007 .

[7]  Daiva Zilioniene,et al.  Evaluation of Soil Shear Strength Parameters via Triaxial Testing by Height Versus Diameter Ratio of Sample , 2009 .

[8]  Ronald E. Wahl,et al.  Rapid Soils Analysis Kit for Low-Volume Roads and Contingency Airfields , 2007 .

[9]  B Obika,et al.  Developments in Innovative Low-Volume Road Technology in Botswana , 1999 .

[10]  Renato Lamberti,et al.  Models of Operating Speeds for Low-Volume Roads , 2011 .

[11]  André Molenaar Characterization of Some Tropical Soils for Road Pavements , 2007 .

[12]  Kornelija Ratkeviciute,et al.  Safety Ranking of the Lithuanian Road Network of National Significance , 2012 .

[13]  Gianluca Dell’Acqua Reducing Traffic Injuries Resulting from Excess Speed , 2011 .

[14]  Steven M Bloser Commonly Used Aggregate Materials and Placement Methods , 2007 .

[15]  Renato Lamberti,et al.  Indirect Skid Resistance Measurement for Porous Asphalt Pavement Management , 2011 .