Analysis of the Content and Purpose of Four Different Kinds of Electronic Communications Among Preservice Teachers

This study examines the content and purposes of four different types of electronic exchanges among a cohort of preservice elementary education majors across three semesters. Messages were exchanged (a) student to peer, (b) student to keypal, (c) student to instructor, and (d) student to group of peers using Web-based software that supported asynchronous, threaded discussions. The major purposes electronic communications served included opportunities for personal reflection, sharing teaching activities, and offering support. However, the peer-to-group messages fostered more reflective exchanges than other forms of one-to-one electronic communication studied.

[1]  The Effects of Time, Teaching Certification Type, and Field Placement on Reflective Thinking in Preservice Teachers. , 1994 .

[2]  H. J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Educational Discourses, the Nature of the Child, and the Practice of New Teachers , 1995 .

[3]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  Expertise in Teaching from a Developmental Perspective: The Developmental Teacher Education Program at Berkeley , 1993 .

[4]  C. Fosnot.  Enquiring Teachers, Enquiring Learners: A Constructivist Approach for Teaching , 1989 .

[5]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Teacher Development in Professional Practice Schools , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Media and method , 1994 .

[7]  William Blanton,et al.  Structuring Telecommunications to Create Instructional Conversations about Student Teaching , 1996 .

[8]  Katherine K. Merseth.  General Interest , 1991 .

[9]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[10]  A. Shanker.  Tomorrow's Teachers , 1950 .

[11]  Randall Souviney.  InternNet: Network Communication and Teacher Development , 1995 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[13]  Linda A. Hoover.  Reflective writing as a window on preservice teachers' thought processes , 1994 .

[14]  Linda R. Valli,et al.  Reflective teacher education : cases and critiques , 1992 .

[15]  Thomas W. Bean,et al.  Charting stages of preservice teacher development and reflection in a multicultural community through dialogue journal analysis , 1992 .

[16]  Helen L. Harrington,et al.  Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers , 1995 .

[17]  E. Surbeck,et al.  Assessing Reflective Responses in Journals. , 1991 .

[18]  Renee T. Clift,et al.  Telecommunication, Student Teaching, and Methods Instruction: An Exploratory Investigation , 1996 .

[19]  Daniel P. Liston,et al.  Teaching Student Teachers to Reflect , 1987 .

[20]  M. Levine.  Professional Practice Schools: Linking Teacher Education and School Reform. , 1992 .

[21]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[22]  Katherine K. Merseth.  Supporting Beginning Teachers with Computer Networks. , 1991 .

[23]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  The Development of Beginning Teachers' Pedagogical Thinking: A Longitudinal Analysis of Four Case Studies. , 1992 .

[24]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Confounding in Educational Computing Research , 1985 .

[25]  K. Hopkins,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Pupil Achievement and Other Variables in Graded and Ungraded Classes , 1965 .

[26]  Jim Anderson,et al.  Literacy Teachers Learning a New Literacy: A Study of the Use of Electronic Mail in a Reading Education Class. , 1995 .

[27]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[28]  Frances F. Fuller.  Concerns of Teachers: A Developmental Conceptualization1 , 1969 .

[29]  Andrea Guillaume,et al.  Student teachers' growth toward independence: An analysis of their changing concerns , 1993 .

[30]  Arthur A. Hyde,et al.  Best Practice: New Standards for Teaching and Learning in America's Schools , 1993 .

[31]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Professional Development Schools: Schools for Developing a Profession. , 1994 .