A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces

The Jaipur prosthetic foot was developed in India in response to specific socio-cultural needs of Indian amputees. It is being used extensively in India and several other developing countries. Its claim of being a cheaper and satisfactory alternative to other prosthetic feet has not been investigated biomechanically. The present study was undertaken to compare its biomechanical properties with the SACH and Seattle feet, using ground reaction forces. Three trans-tibial amputees participated in the experiment which measured the ground reaction force data using a Kistler force plate. Subject's normal foot was used as a reference. Six variables from the vertical and anteroposterior components of ground reaction forces were quantified, their statistical analysis showed that the normal foot generates significantly larger ground reaction forces than the prosthetic foot. The shock absortion capacity of the SACH foot was found to be better when compared with the other two feet, while the Jaipur foot allowed a more natural gait and was closer in performance to the normal foot. None of the prostheses significantly influenced the locomotor style of the amputees.

[1]  I. Paul,et al.  Role of mechanical factors in pathogenesis of primary osteoarthritis. , 1972, Lancet.

[2]  J. Perry.  Kinesiology of lower extremity bracing. , 1974, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. K. Sethi,et al.  Vulcanized rubber foot for lower limb amputees , 1978, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  A. Voloshin,et al.  An in vivo study of low back pain and shock absorption in the human locomotor system. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  S. E. Solomonidis,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet , 1984, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  J Mizrahi,et al.  Some gait characteristics of below-knee amputees and their reflection on the ground reaction forces. , 1986, Engineering in medicine.

[7]  M S Zahedi,et al.  Repeatability of kinetic and kinematic measurements in gait studies of the lower limb amputee , 1987, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  J E Edelstein.  Prosthetic feet. State of the Art. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[9]  Shock absorption of below-knee prostheses: a comparison between the SACH and the Multiflex foot. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J Perry,et al.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Overview of prosthetic feet. , 1990, Instructional course lectures.

[12]  T Kasahara,et al.  Functional evaluation by gait analysis of various ankle-foot assemblies used by below-knee amputees , 1992, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  A Lees,et al.  The longitudinal variability of ground reaction forces in experienced and inexperienced runners. , 1994, Ergonomics.