Participatory, explorative, qualitative modeling: application of the iMODELER software to assess trade-offs among the SDGs

Abstract The UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in their generalized form need to be further reflected in order to identify synergies and trade-offs between their targets, and to apply them to concrete nations and regions. Explorative qualitative cause and effect modeling could serve as an approach for considering crucial factors to better understand the interrelations among the SDGs, eventually leading to more informed concrete measures that are able to cope with the SDG’s inherent obstacles. This work describes a model that could serve as a template for concrete application. The generalized model already points to some potential trade-offs. Its first analysis cautiously raises doubts that some possible assumptions behind the SDGs might overlook systemic boundaries. For example, an undifferentiated increase of productivity contradicts a lessened environmental impact and need for resources in light of potential planetary boundaries. However, the model was developed as a starting point and requires modification for its application to a concrete region.

[1]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[2]  Christa Liedtke,et al.  Das Mips-Konzept , 1999 .

[3]  Kai Neumann 'Know Why' Thinking as a New Approach to Systems Thinking , 2013 .

[4]  N. Roy,et al.  Transitioning toward Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Household Environment in Influencing Child Health in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia Using Recent Demographic Health Surveys , 2016, Front. Public Health.

[5]  D. Reider,et al.  Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System , 2012 .

[6]  S. Hawkes,et al.  Health in the sustainable development goals: ready for a paradigm shift? , 2015, Globalization and Health.

[7]  A. Hess,et al.  Management. , 2020, Anesthesiology.

[8]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Prosperity Without Growth , 2009 .

[9]  Jamie Perin,et al.  National and subnational all-cause and cause-specific child mortality in China, 1996–2015: a systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Lancet Global Health.

[10]  Tony Delamothe,et al.  Happiness , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  J. Bain,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article How Many Variables Can Humans Process? , 2022 .

[12]  Gavin Yamey,et al.  Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010–30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN Sustainable Development Goal for health , 2015, The Lancet.

[13]  E. Barbier,et al.  The Sustainable Development Goals and the systems approach to sustainability , 2017 .

[14]  Colin Crouch,et al.  The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism , 2011 .

[15]  P. Parijs,et al.  Basic Income in a Globalized Economy , 2012 .

[16]  D. Rybski,et al.  A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions , 2017 .

[17]  Christopher J L Murray,et al.  Choosing indicators for the health-related SDG targets , 2015, The Lancet.

[18]  Eric D. Beinhocker The Origin of Wealth , 2006 .

[19]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Assessing the land resource–food price nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Science Advances.

[20]  Matteo Pedercini,et al.  Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[21]  D. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the Limits , 1992 .

[22]  C. Barrington-Leigh Sustainability and Well-Being: A Happy Synergy , 2016 .

[23]  Eyal Oren,et al.  Measuring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: a baseline analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, Lancet.