Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography compared with positron emission tomography for assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction: The iPOWER study.

BACKGROUND Coronary microvascular function can be assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography as a coronary flow velocity reserve (TTDE CFVR) and by positron emission tomography as a myocardial blood flow reserve (PET MBFR). PET MBFR is regarded the noninvasive reference standard for measuring coronary microvascular function but has limited availability. We compared TTDE CFVR with PET MBFR in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease and assessed repeatability of TTDE CFVR. METHODS From a cohort of women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery stenosis at invasive coronary angiography, TTDE CFVR by dipyridamole induced stress and MBFR by rubidium-82 PET with adenosine was successfully measured in 107 subjects. Repeatability of TTDE CFVR was assessed in 10 symptomatic women and in 10 healthy individuals. RESULTS MBFR was systematically higher than CFVR. Median MBFR (interquartile range, IQR) was 2.68 (2.29-3.10) and CFVR (IQR) was 2.31 (1.89-2.72). Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.36 (p<0.01). Limits of agreement (2·standard deviation) assessed by the Bland-Altman (confidence interval, CI) method was 1.49 (1.29;1.69) and unaffected by time-interval between examinations. Results were similar when adjusting for rate pressure product or focusing on perfusion of the left anterior descending artery region. Limits of agreement (CI) for repeated CFVR in 10 healthy individuals and in 10 women with angina was 0.44 (0.21;0.68) and 0.48 (0.22; 0.74), respectively. CONCLUSION CFVR had a good repeatability, but the agreement between CFVR and MBFR was modest. Divergence could be due to methodology differences; TTDE estimates flow velocities whereas PET estimates myocardial blood flow.

[1]  J. Kastrup,et al.  Coronary Microvascular Function and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women With Angina Pectoris and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: The iPOWER Study , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[2]  P. Noseworthy,et al.  Electrocardiographic predictors of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Utility of a novel T wave analysis program. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  M. Javadi,et al.  Impaired Global Myocardial Flow Dynamics Despite Normal Left Ventricular Function and Regional Perfusion in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Quantitative Analysis of Clinical 82Rb PET/CT Studies , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[5]  Debiao Li,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  Francis R. Verdun,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  J. Kastrup,et al.  Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Assessed by Transthoracic Doppler: The iPOWER Study: Factors Influencing Feasibility and Quality. , 2016, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  S. Reis,et al.  Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  H. Seo,et al.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  Parthiban Arumugam,et al.  Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET , 2014, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  C. Tribouilloy,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow and coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: a magic tool for the real world. , 2008, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  Filippo Crea,et al.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  M. Pencina,et al.  Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 2011, Circulation.

[16]  M. Phelps,et al.  Influence of Age and Hemodynamics on Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve , 1993, Circulation.

[17]  J. Knuuti,et al.  Coronary flow reserve: measurement with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is reproducible and comparable with positron emission tomography. , 2001, Clinical physiology.

[18]  D. Hildick-Smith,et al.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve by adenosine transthoracic echocardiography: validation with intracoronary Doppler. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[19]  E. Prescott,et al.  Coronary flow velocity reserve by echocardiography: feasibility, reproducibility and agreement with PET in overweight and obese patients with stable and revascularized coronary artery disease , 2015, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[20]  H. Lethen,et al.  Comparison of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to intracoronary Doppler guidewire measurements for assessment of coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery for detection of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[22]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[23]  E. Picano,et al.  Additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with chest pain syndrome and normal or near-normal coronary arteries. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  T. Lüscher,et al.  Novel doppler assessment of intracoronary volumetric flow reserve: validation against PET in patients with or without flow-dependent vasodilation. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  K. Gould,et al.  Impact of unexpected factors on quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in young, asymptomatic volunteers. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[26]  Osamu Manabe,et al.  Repeatability of Rest and Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with 82Rb Dynamic PET , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  S. Iliceto,et al.  Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve: comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow wire. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[29]  J. Kastrup,et al.  Improving diagnosis and treatment of women with angina pectoris and microvascular disease: the iPOWER study design and rationale. , 2014, American heart journal.

[30]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  C. Berry,et al.  Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation in the catheter laboratory. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[32]  Ran Klein,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  S. Umemura,et al.  Digital assessment of endothelial function and ischemic heart disease in women. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  D. Mele,et al.  The relationship between early left ventricular myocardial alterations and reduced coronary flow reserve in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with microvascular angina. , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[35]  T Akasaka,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with invasive technique. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.