Performance comparison of breast imaging modalities using a 4AFC human observer study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hilde Bosmans | Kenneth C. Young | Alaleh Rashidnasab | Premkumar Elangovan | Kevin Wells | Alistair Mackenzie | David R. Dance | William P. Segars
[1] Oliver Diaz,et al. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities. , 2014, Medical physics.
[2] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system. , 2012, Medical physics.
[3] Walter Huda,et al. How do lesion size and random noise affect detection performance in digital mammography? , 2006, Academic radiology.
[4] D R Dance,et al. Simulation and assessment of realistic breast lesions using fractal growth models , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[5] D. M. Parkin,et al. Use of Statistics to Assess the Global Burden of Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.
[6] D R Dance,et al. Estimation of scattered radiation in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[7] M Ruschin,et al. Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study. , 2012, Medical physics.
[8] A. Burgess. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.
[9] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis images , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] Alaleh Rashidnasab,et al. Simulation of 3D DLA masses in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Medical Imaging.
[11] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Comparison of Breast Doses for Digital Tomosynthesis Estimated from Patient Exposures and Using PMMA Breast Phantoms , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.