Seismic Fragility Analysis of Bridge System Based on Fuzzy Failure Criteria

In the traditional bridge seismic fragility analysis, the criterion for judging the structural damage state is clear. That is to say, when the damage index exceeds a specific value, the structure is judged to enter the new damage state. However, the actual condition is that the boundary of structural damage is not clear but fuzzy. Taking a three-span V-shaped continuous girder bridge as an example, the damage process of the structure is described by fuzzy mathematics. Considering the uncertainties of ground motion and structure itself, a seismic fragility analysis method is established, which can consider the randomness of bridge itself, seismic load, and structural failure fuzziness simultaneously. Finally, the improved product of conditional marginal (I-PCM) method for fragility analysis of bridge system is further optimized and improved. The new improved method is used to form the seismic fragility curves of bridge structure system. The results show that it is possible to underestimate the potential seismic fragility of bridge components and system without considering the structural fuzzy failure criteria; the fragility curves formed by different membership functions are obviously different; the new system fragility analysis method can significantly improve the analysis accuracy.

[1]  R. Park,et al.  Flexural Members with Confined Concrete , 1971 .

[2]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[3]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[4]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios , 2008 .

[5]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Improved approximation for multinormal integral , 1986 .

[6]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[7]  Cornell,et al.  Earthquakes, Records, and Nonlinear MDOF Responses , 1998 .

[8]  Michel Ghosn,et al.  Seismic Fragility of Continuous Steel Highway Bridges in New York State , 2007 .

[9]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment of Highway Bridges , 2007 .

[10]  Craig D. Comartin,et al.  Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings: A Practical Overview of the ATC 40 Document , 2000 .

[11]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR STRUCTURES. I: METHODOLOGY , 1994 .

[12]  Jong-Su Jeon,et al.  Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes , 2018 .

[13]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  R-Factor Parameterized Bridge Damage Fragility Curves , 2007 .

[14]  Raimundo Delgado,et al.  Influence of Record Selection Procedures on Seismic Loss Estimations , 2014 .

[15]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach , 2006 .

[16]  Wancheng Yuan,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges Considering Different Sources of Uncertainties , 2014 .

[17]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[18]  B. G. Nielson Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2005 .

[19]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  Analysis of approximations for multinormal integration in system reliability computation , 2006 .

[20]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  An effective approximation to evaluate multinormal integrals , 1998 .

[21]  Zhe Zhang,et al.  Artificial neural network based method for seismic fragility analysis of steel frames , 2018 .

[22]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[23]  Tu Hongmao,et al.  AN IMPROVED PRODUCT OF CONDITIONAL MARGINAL METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL SYSTEM RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[24]  Robert Firth,et al.  Earthquakes , 1923, The Classical Review.

[25]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[26]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR STRUCTURES. II: APPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[27]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Hazard Disaggregation and Record Selection for Fragility Analysis and Earthquake Loss Estimation , 2017 .