Toward Regression-Based Estimation of Localization Errors in Fingerprinting-Based Localization

Location information is a valuable source of context that can be utilized by end-user applications and wireless networks to optimize their performance and usability. When used, location information should ideally be considered jointly with the estimate of its accuracy. Most of the current approaches for estimating the accuracy rely on performing a static performance benchmark of a localization solution in a deployment environment, which fails to capture the dynamic nature of the environment. We address this problem for fingerprinting-based localization by grounding the estimation of localization errors on the low-level features, i.e. the RSS values from APs used in fingerprinting. We use these low-level features measured at different locations in an environment, as well as their respective localization errors, to train different regression models, allowing us to predict the localization errors at new locations, given new observed values of the low-level features at these locations. Our evaluation results show substantially better performance of the proposed regression-based estimation of localization errors compared to static performance benchmarks.

[1]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Infrastructure for benchmarking RF-based indoor localization under controlled interference , 2014, 2014 Ubiquitous Positioning Indoor Navigation and Location Based Service (UPINLBS).

[2]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Performance analysis of multiple Indoor Positioning Systems in a healthcare environment , 2016, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[3]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Location-Based Decision-Making Mechanism for Device-to-Device Link Establishment , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[4]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  An overview of statistical learning theory , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  Franco Mazzenga,et al.  Channel models for IEEE 802.11b indoor system design , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[6]  Jie Liu,et al.  A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies: experiences and lessons learned , 2015, IPSN.

[7]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Experimental evaluation of RF-based indoor localization algorithms under RF interference , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Location and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

[8]  A. Wolisz,et al.  Demo Abstract : Testbed Infrastructure for Benchmarking RF-based Indoor Localization Solutions under Controlled Interference , 2014 .

[9]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  Hypothesis Testing Based Model for Fingerprinting Localization Algorithms , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[10]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Toward Extrapolation of WiFi Fingerprinting Performance Across Environments , 2016, HotMobile.

[11]  Luca De Nardis,et al.  On the Applicability of Multi-wall Multi-floor Propagation Models to WiFi Fingerprinting Indoor Positioning , 2015, FABULOUS.

[12]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Experimental decomposition of the performance of fingerprinting-based localization algorithms , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[13]  Herbert Peremans,et al.  Conditional Entropy and Location Error in Indoor Localization Using Probabilistic Wi-Fi Fingerprinting , 2016, Sensors.

[14]  John R. Anderson,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING An Artificial Intelligence Approach , 2009 .

[15]  Yongtao Ma,et al.  A Probabilistic Radio Map Construction Scheme for Crowdsourcing-Based Fingerprinting Localization , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[16]  Bernard Uguen,et al.  Location-quality-aware policy optimisation for relay selection in mobile networks , 2015, Wirel. Networks.

[17]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Location-Aware Communications for 5G Networks: How location information can improve scalability, latency, and robustness of 5G , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.