Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES This study focuses on the continuation of gainful employment after experiencing stroke, addressing factors indicative of readiness for return to work, subjective well-being and life satisfaction. METHODS The target group comprised 120 patients, studied by means of medical records and postal questionnaires. RESULTS A total of 41% had returned to work, although there were changes concerning employers, assignments and working hours. Individuals who had returned to work reported a significantly higher level in subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Being able to walk meant the greatest chance of returning to work (odds ratio = 3.98) followed by white-collar worker (odds ratio = 2.99) and having preserved cognitive capacity (odds ratio = 2.64). CONCLUSION Returning to work after stroke is a major factor for high subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Three factors indicative of readiness for return to work were identified, providing implications for more efficient vocational rehabilitation programmes.

[1]  S Iwarsson,et al.  Quality of life in the elderly population: an example exploring interrelationships among subjective well-being, ADL dependence, and housing accessibility. , 1997, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[2]  S. Saeki,et al.  Return to work after stroke. A follow-up study. , 1995, Stroke.

[3]  Robert Dubin,et al.  The world of work , 2017 .

[4]  F. Clark.  Occupation embedded in a real life: interweaving occupational science and occupational therapy. 1993 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  Dimitris Michailakis,et al.  Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities , 1995, Human Rights and Disabled Persons.

[6]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Göteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  R. M. Cruse,et al.  A National Perspective , 1991 .

[8]  R. Black-Schaffer,et al.  Return to work after stroke: development of a predictive model. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  S. Espmark.  Stroke before 50. A follow-up study of vocational and psychological adjustment. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[10]  M. Limburg,et al.  Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. , 1997, Stroke.

[11]  E. Jonkman,et al.  Quality of life after a first ischemic stroke , 1998, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[12]  B. Hindfelt,et al.  THE PROGNOSIS OF ISCHEMIC STROKE IN YOUNG ADULTS , 1977, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[13]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  Vocational rehabilitation in northern Sweden. III. Aspects of life satisfaction. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  B. Norrving,et al.  Increased stroke incidence in Lund-Orup, Sweden, between 1983 to 1985 and 1993 to 1995. , 2000, Stroke.

[15]  C. Anderson,et al.  Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke : results from the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. , 2000, Stroke.

[16]  E. Yerxa.  Health and the human spirit for occupation. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  S. Kittner,et al.  Stroke location is not associated with return to work after first ischemic stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[18]  B. Norrving,et al.  Costs of Stroke in Sweden A National Perspective , 1994, Stroke.

[19]  Richard L. Abbott,et al.  A Follow-up Study , 1990 .

[20]  J. Ekholm,et al.  Impairment/function and disability/activity 3 years after cerebrovascular incident or brain trauma: a rehabilitation and occupational therapy view. , 1991, International disability studies.

[21]  J. Malm,et al.  Cognitive impairment in young adults with infratentorial infarcts , 1998, Neurology.

[22]  D. Crown,et al.  Return to Work Factors Following a Stroke , 1998 .

[23]  G. Whiteneck.  Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes , 1994 .

[24]  G. Gudjonsson,et al.  The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[25]  A. Adunsky,et al.  Functional recovery in young stroke patients. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  J. Ekholm,et al.  Medical and social factors affecting behaviour patterns in patients with acquired brain damage: a study of patients living at home three years after the incident. , 1992, Disability and rehabilitation.

[27]  J. Toole,et al.  Factors influencing return to work following cerebral infarction. , 1985, JAMA.

[28]  Quality of life and hypertension. Where do we stand? New methods, new possibilities. Definition and measurement of quality of life from a medical perspective. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement.

[29]  M. Lezak.  Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .