Minimally invasive transradial intervention using sheathless standard guiding catheters

Objectives: We evaluated a sheathless transradial technique for interventions using standard five and six French nonhydrophilic guiding catheters. Background: Miniaturization of transradial interventions may serve to improve patient comfort and reduce the risk of access‐site complications. Guiding catheters carry an outer diameter approximately 2 Fr sizes smaller than their corresponding introducer sheaths. Methods: We identified consecutive patients who underwent transradial intervention between August 2010 and December 2010 using 5 or 6 Fr guides with a sheathless technique. Results: A total of 11 patients were identified (mean age 70.7 ± 10.9 years; 73% male). Single coronary intervention was performed in 10 patients and renal artery intervention in one. Right radial access and 6 Fr guide catheters were used in the majority (each 73%). Five techniques were used to create an inner dilator as the taper. Four of these inner tapers (standard diagnostic catheters, hydrophilic diagnostic catheters, long sheath dilators and guide extensions) enabled successful sheathless guide insertion in all 10 patients attempted. One technique (a partially inflated angioplasty balloon protruding from the guide) attempted in one patient was unsuccessful. All interventional procedures were successful, there were no radial artery access‐site complications and in no case was cross‐over to femoral artery access‐site required. Conclusion: Sheathless transradial intervention using standard 5 and 6 Fr guiding catheters is a safe and effective method for treatment of coronary and peripheral vascular lesions. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  C. Rihal,et al.  Sheathless transradial intervention using standard guide catheters , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  S. Saito,et al.  CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Original Studies Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Virtual 3-Fr Guiding Catheter , 2010 .

[3]  J. Goldstein Coronary intervention with miniaturized guiding systems: Is smaller necessarily better? , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. Stables,et al.  Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  F. Gao,et al.  Incidence and predictors of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography and intervention. , 2010, Chinese medical journal.

[7]  M. Liang,et al.  Transradial simultaneous kissing stenting (SKS) with SheathLess access , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  M. Mamas,et al.  Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A feasibility study , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  H. Völzke,et al.  A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  S. Saito,et al.  Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.