Qualitative Probabilistic Inference with Default Inheritance

There are numerous formal systems that allow inference of new con- ditionals based on a conditional knowledge base. Many of these systems have been analysed theoretically and some have been tested against human reasoning in psychological studies, but experiments evaluating the performance of such systems are rare. In this article, we extend the experiments in (19) in order to evaluate the inferential properties of c-representations in comparison to the well-known Sys- tems P and Z. Since it is known that System Z and c-representations mainly differ in the sorts of inheritance inferences they allow, we discuss subclass inheritance and present experimental data for this type of inference in particular.

[1]  Paul D. Thorn,et al.  REWARD VERSUS RISK IN UNCERTAIN INFERENCE: THEOREMS AND SIMULATIONS , 2012, The Review of Symbolic Logic.

[2]  E. W. Adams,et al.  The Logic of Conditionals: An Application Of Probability To Deductive Logic , 2010 .

[3]  Paul D. Thorn,et al.  Qualitative probabilistic inference under varied entropy levels , 2016, J. Appl. Log..

[4]  Marco Ragni,et al.  Can Formal Non-monotonic Systems Properly Describe Human Reasoning? , 2014, CogSci.

[5]  Hector Geffner,et al.  Conditional Entailment: Bridging two Approaches to Default Reasoning , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[6]  D. V. Gokhale,et al.  Theory of Probability, Vol. I , 1975 .

[7]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment , 1993, IJCAI.

[8]  Judea Pearl,et al.  System Z: a Natural Ordering of Defaults with Tractable Applications to Nonmonotonic Reasoning^ , 1990 .

[9]  Donald Nute,et al.  Counterfactuals , 1975, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[10]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[11]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  The Laws of Belief - Ranking Theory and Its Philosophical Applications , 2012 .

[12]  James Hawthorne,et al.  The Quantitative/Qualitative Watershed for Rules of Uncertain Inference , 2007, Stud Logica.

[13]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision: Considering Conditionals as Agents , 2001 .

[14]  Paul D. Thorn,et al.  A Utility Based Evaluation of Logico-probabilistic Systems , 2014, Stud Logica.

[15]  K. J. Evans Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge , 1993 .

[16]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  What does a Conditional Knowledge Base Entail? , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Niki Pfeifer,et al.  Coherence and Nonmonotonicity in Human Reasoning , 2005, Synthese.

[18]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[19]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  A Thorough Axiomatization of a Principle of Conditional Preservation in Belief Revision , 2004, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[20]  H. Kyburg,et al.  Nomic probability and the foundations of induction , 1990 .

[21]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  Structural Inference from Conditional Knowledge Bases , 2014, Stud Logica.

[22]  Paul D. Thorn,et al.  Ampliative Inference Under Varied Entropy Levels , 2013 .

[23]  David Makinson,et al.  General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning , 1994 .

[24]  Ernest W. Adams,et al.  A note on comparing probabilistic and modal logics of conditionals , 2008 .

[25]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States , 1988 .