Recommendations for the collection and use of multiplexed functional data for clinical variant interpretation

Variants of uncertain significance represent a massive challenge to medical genetics. Multiplexed functional assays, in which the functional effects of thousands of genomic variants are assessed simultaneously, are increasingly generating data that can be used as additional evidence for or against variant pathogenicity. Such assays have the potential to resolve variants of uncertain significance, thereby increasing the clinical utility of genomic testing. Existing standards from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and new guidelines from the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) establish the role of functional data in variant interpretation, but do not address the specific challenges or advantages of using functional data derived from multiplexed assays. Here, we build on these existing guidelines to provide recommendations to experimentalists for the production and reporting of multiplexed functional data and to clinicians for the evaluation and use of such data. By following these recommendations, experimentalists can produce transparent, complete, and well-validated datasets that are primed for clinical uptake. Our recommendations to clinicians and diagnostic labs on how to evaluate the quality of multiplexed functional datasets, and how different datasets could be incorporated into the ACMG/AMP variant-interpretation framework, will hopefully clarify whether and how such data should be used. The recommendations that we provide are designed to enhance the quality and utility of multiplexed functional data, and to promote their judicious use.

[1]  Alan F. Rubin,et al.  A Combined Approach Reveals a Regulatory Mechanism Coupling Src's Kinase Activity, Localization, and Phosphotransferase-Independent Functions. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[2]  Johan T. den Dunnen,et al.  Describing Sequence Variants Using HGVS Nomenclature. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[3]  Leslie Burke,et al.  Towards controlled terminology for reporting germline cancer susceptibility variants: an ENIGMA report , 2019, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[4]  M. Murray,et al.  Genome-first findings require precision phenotyping , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[5]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 2018, PLoS genetics.

[6]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[7]  S. Fields,et al.  Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science , 2014, Nature Methods.

[8]  J C Olsen,et al.  Identification of a splice site mutation (2789+5 G>A) associated with small amounts of normal CFTRmRNA and mild cystic fibrosis , 1997, Human mutation.

[9]  Taylor L. Mighell,et al.  A saturation mutagenesis approach to understanding PTEN lipid phosphatase activity and genotype-phenotypes relationships , 2018, bioRxiv.

[10]  Heidi L Rehm,et al.  Updated recommendation for the benign stand‐alone ACMG/AMP criterion , 2018, Human mutation.

[11]  Eran Segal,et al.  A Systematic p53 Mutation Library Links Differential Functional Impact to Cancer Mutation Pattern and Evolutionary Conservation. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[12]  Jay Shendure,et al.  A Multiplex Homology-Directed DNA Repair Assay Reveals the Impact of More Than 1,000 BRCA1 Missense Substitution Variants on Protein Function. , 2018, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  Marilyn M. Li,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[14]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[15]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[16]  Robert Huether,et al.  Gene‐specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: Recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel , 2018, Human mutation.

[17]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Functional Testing of Thousands of Osteoarthritis-Associated Variants for Regulatory Activity , 2018 .

[18]  Vanessa E. Gray,et al.  Multiplex Assessment of Protein Variant Abundance by Massively Parallel Sequencing , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Lea M. Starita,et al.  Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework , 2019, Genome Medicine.

[20]  Chunlei Liu,et al.  ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  Toward interoperable bioscience data , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[22]  R. E. Tully,et al.  Locus Reference Genomic sequences: an improved basis for describing human DNA variants , 2010, Genome Medicine.

[23]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Quantitative Missense Variant Effect Prediction Using Large-Scale Mutagenesis Data. , 2017, Cell systems.

[24]  Wolfgang Link,et al.  Protein localization in disease and therapy , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  Inês Barroso,et al.  Prospective functional classification of all possible missense variants in PPARG , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Aleksandar Milosavljevic,et al.  ClinGen Allele Registry links information about genetic variants , 2018, Human mutation.

[27]  K. Davies,et al.  Functional genetic analysis of mutations implicated in a human speech and language disorder. , 2006, Human molecular genetics.

[28]  Moriah H Nissan,et al.  OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[29]  Tariq Ahmad,et al.  Massive parallel variant characterization identifies NUDT15 alleles associated with thiopurine toxicity , 2019, bioRxiv.

[30]  Johan T den Dunnen,et al.  Describing Sequence Variants Using HGVS Nomenclature. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  Donna Neuberg,et al.  A dominant-negative effect drives selection of TP53 missense mutations in myeloid malignancies , 2019, Science.

[32]  Atina G. Coté,et al.  A framework for exhaustively mapping functional missense variants , 2017, Molecular systems biology.

[33]  J C Olsen,et al.  A novel mutation in the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with pulmonary disease but normal sweat chloride concentrations. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  J. Moult,et al.  Loss of protein structure stability as a major causative factor in monogenic disease. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Xiang Wan,et al.  Sharing and Reusing Gene Expression Profiling Data in Neuroscience , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[36]  Deanna M. Church,et al.  ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Saturation mutagenesis of twenty disease-associated regulatory elements at single base-pair resolution , 2019, Nature Communications.

[38]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Variant Interpretation: Functional Assays to the Rescue. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[39]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Aviad Tsherniak,et al.  Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[41]  R. Nussbaum,et al.  Modeling the ACMG/AMP Variant Classification Guidelines as a Bayesian Classification Framework , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[42]  Mingming Jia,et al.  COSMIC: somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  D. Baker,et al.  High Resolution Mapping of Protein Sequence–Function Relationships , 2010, Nature Methods.

[44]  Yasset Perez-Riverol,et al.  Making proteomics data accessible and reusable: Current state of proteomics databases and repositories , 2015, Proteomics.

[45]  David L. Young,et al.  Massively Parallel Functional Analysis of BRCA1 RING Domain Variants , 2015, Genetics.

[46]  Joseph D. Janizek,et al.  Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing , 2018, Nature.

[47]  Mariko Y Momoi,et al.  Intracellular distribution of a speech/language disorder associated FOXP2 mutant. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[48]  Jay Shendure,et al.  High-resolution analysis of DNA regulatory elements by synthetic saturation mutagenesis , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[50]  James Y. Zou Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans , 2015, Nature.

[51]  Frederick P. Roth,et al.  MaveDB: an open-source platform to distribute and interpret data from multiplexed assays of variant effect , 2019, Genome Biology.

[52]  J. Shendure,et al.  The power of multiplexed functional analysis of genetic variants , 2016, Nature Protocols.