Stimulus probability and motor response in young and old adults: An ERP study

The effects of responding hand and stimulus probability were investigated in young and old subjects in an RT task in which both rare and frequent stimuli required a response. It was found that the effect of stimulus probability was less pronounced in old subjects than in young, and that the latency of P3 was longer in the elderly, although their RTs were not different from young subjects. ERPs for right hand responses were larger than for left hand responses; this difference was discernible already in the P2 and N2 peaks of the ERP. A tentative explanation is offered for these large and unexpected hand differences. An interpretation in terms of an age-related decrease in resources is proposed for the increased P3 latency and the decreased probability effect on P3 amplitude in old subjects.

[1]  D. Wechsler,et al.  Wechsler's Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence , 1972 .

[2]  A. Starr,et al.  P300 latency correlates with digit span. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[3]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[4]  J. C. Woestenburg,et al.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[5]  S Griew Age and the matching of signal frequency in a two-channel detection task. , 1968, Journal of gerontology.

[6]  H. Shibasaki,et al.  Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  A. Kok Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[8]  E. Donchin Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review , 1978 .

[9]  J. Cerella Information processing rates in the elderly. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. , 1982, Science.

[12]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The effect of handedness, the responding hand, and response force on the contralateral dominance of the readiness potential , 1977 .

[13]  P Rabbitt,et al.  Selective anticipation for events in old age. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and cognitive deficits : The role of attentional resources , 1982 .

[16]  T W Picton,et al.  The effects of age on human event-related potentials. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[17]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[18]  P. Holcomb,et al.  The effects of aging on the P3 component of the visual event-related potential. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  T. Salthouse Speed of behavior and its implications for cog-nition , 1985 .

[20]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials. I. Normal aging. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  R. Naatanen,et al.  The orienting reflex and the N2 deflection of the event-related potential (ERP) , 1983 .

[22]  W. Dixon BMD : biomedical computer programs , 1967 .

[23]  Ray Johnson P300: A Model of the Variables Controlling Its Amplitude a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[25]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Kok,et al.  The effect of repetition of infrequent familiar and unfamiliar visual patterns on components of the event-related brain potential , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[27]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[28]  T. Salthouse A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .

[29]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  M. Donald,et al.  3 Neural Selectivity in Auditory Attention: Sketch of A Theory , 1983 .

[31]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  5 The Orienting Reflex and the N2 Deflection of the Event-Related Potential (ERP) , 1983 .

[32]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[33]  A. Kok Overlap between P300 and movement-related-potentials: A response to Verleger , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[34]  A. Sanders 20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .

[35]  B Renault,et al.  Onset and offset of brain events as indices of mental chronometry. , 1982, Science.

[36]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Temporal dynamics of human auditory selective attention. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[37]  David M. Lane,et al.  Information processing components of substitution test performance. , 1985 .

[38]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[39]  R. Ragot,et al.  Perceptual and motor space representation: an event-related potential study. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[40]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[41]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Expectancy for events in old age: stimulus sequence effects on P300 and reaction time. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[42]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Evoked potentials and stages of information processing: Methods of analysis , 1987 .

[43]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[44]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Albert Kok,et al.  Probability mismatch and template mismatch: A paradox in P300 amplitude? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  T W Picton,et al.  Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. , 1981, Canadian journal of psychology.

[47]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[48]  J. Ford,et al.  Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[49]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  C C Wood,et al.  Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[51]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[52]  J. Birren,et al.  Handbook of the psychology of aging, 3rd ed. , 1985 .

[53]  E. Donchin,et al.  People with Absolute Pitch Process Tones Without Producing a P300 , 1984, Science.

[54]  K. Squires,et al.  Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[55]  E Hunt,et al.  Mathematical models of the event-related potential. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[56]  E Donchin,et al.  Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach. , 1982, Psychophysiology.