Timing and position response of a block detector for fast neutron time-of-flight imaging

Abstract Our research effort seeks to improve the spatial and timing performance of a block detector made of a pixilated plastic scintillator (EJ-200), first demonstrated as part of Oak Ridge National Laboratory׳s Advanced Portable Neutron Imaging System. Improvement of the position and time response is necessary to achieve better resolution and contrast in the images of shielded special nuclear material. Time-of-flight is used to differentiate between gamma and different sources of neutrons (e.g., transmission and fission neutrons). Factors limiting the timing and position performance of the neutron detector have been revealed through simulations and measurements. Simulations have suggested that the degradation in the ability to resolve pixels in the neutron detector is due to those interactions occurring near the light guide. The energy deposition within the neutron detector is shown to affect position performance and imaging efficiency. This examination details how energy cuts improve the position performance and degrade the imaging efficiency. Measurements have shown the neutron detector to have a timing resolution of σ =238 ps. The majority of this timing uncertainty is from the depth-of-interaction (DOI) of the neutron which is confirmed by simulations and analytical calculations.

[1]  M. J. Berger ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions , 1992 .

[2]  Philip R. Bingham,et al.  Portable fast-neutron radiography with the nuclear materials identification system for fissile material transfers , 2007 .

[3]  W. Moses,et al.  Characterization of a 64 channel PET detector using photodiodes for crystal identification , 1997 .

[4]  S. Incerti,et al.  Geant4 developments and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  N. M. Larson,et al.  ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data , 2011 .

[7]  J. Cates,et al.  Timing Resolution Study of an Associated Particle Detector for Fast Neutron Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  J. Cates,et al.  Benchmarking the Geant4 full system simulation of an associated alpha-particle detector for use in a D-T neutron generator. , 2012, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[9]  R. Vinke Time-of-flight PET with SiPM sensors on monolithic scintillation crystals , 2011 .

[10]  Edward J. Hoffman,et al.  Towards a Practical Implementation of the MLE Algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  F. Habte,et al.  A Comparison of GEANT4 and DETECT2000 for the simulation of light transport in scintillation detectors , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  D. Schaart,et al.  Optimization of digital time pickoff methods for LaBr3-SiPM TOF-PET detectors , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[13]  F. Habte,et al.  Enhancing pixelated fast-neutron block detector performance using a slotted light guide , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[14]  Haiming Yu,et al.  Investigation of delay compensation circuit techniques to reduce timing walk , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[15]  E. Auffray,et al.  Effect of Aspect Ratio on the Light Output of Scintillators , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.