Active surveillance for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Most of low grade (LG) bladder tumors will experience disease recurrence and very few of them (<2%) will experience disease progression. Therefore active surveillance (AS) for LG non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has emerged. The goal of our study was to provide a literature review of AS for LG NMIBC including inclusion criteria, modalities and oncological outcomes. We conducted a systematic review (registered in PROSPERO: CRD42018102935) using MEDLINE and EMBASE between June 2018 and August 2018 with the following terms: LG, NMIBC, AS, urothelial neoplasm. Overall, 6 studies that reached our scope of review were included cumulating 403 patients with 2 prospective trials. Inclusion criteria were: recurrent LG (G1 and G2) Ta or T1 NMIBC, with a negative cytology, a low volume (<10 mm) and low number (<5) of tumors. Cystoscopy every 3 months during the first 2 years and every 6 months afterwards were required. AS dropout criteria were presence of tumor-related symptoms, a positive cytology, a modification of tumor morphology or size and patient’s request. Pooled data showed an overall 65% reclassification rate where 15% of patients were reclassified based on grade and 10% on stage with a median follow-up of 32 months (IQR, 24–42 months). Only one study reported on progression to MIBC in 4 patients out of 186 (2%). Most of patients enrolled in an AS protocol for recurrent LG NMIBC will undergo a TURBT eventually. Many patients may be eligible to this therapeutic approach but current knowledge does not support its use in daily practice outside of a clinical trial.

[1]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  Pathological Outcomes for Patients Who Failed To Remain Under Active Surveillance for Low-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Update and Results from the Bladder Cancer Italian Active Surveillance Project. , 2018, European urology oncology.

[2]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[3]  Ludmila V. Danilova,et al.  Non-invasive detection of urothelial cancer through the analysis of driver gene mutations and aneuploidy , 2018, eLife.

[4]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  Active Surveillance for Low Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Confirmatory and Resource Consumption Study from the BIAS Project , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Jeffrey A. Cadeddu,et al.  Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Timothy C. Chang,et al.  Image-Guided Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors – Current Practice and Future Outlooks , 2017, Bladder Cancer.

[8]  M. Rouprêt,et al.  Re: Long-term Oncological Outcomes of an Active Surveillance Program in Recurrent Low Grade Ta Bladder Cancer. , 2017, European urology.

[9]  P. Carroll,et al.  Expert consensus document: Semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer — results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure , 2017, Nature Reviews Urology.

[10]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2017, European urology.

[11]  Maximilian Burger,et al.  EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. , 2017, European urology.

[12]  G. Guazzoni,et al.  Active surveillance for low‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: mid‐term results from the Bladder cancer Italian Active Surveillance (BIAS) project , 2016, BJU international.

[13]  V. Hernández,et al.  Long-term oncological outcomes of an active surveillance program in recurrent low grade Ta bladder cancer. , 2016, Urologic oncology.

[14]  J. Witjes,et al.  Economic Burden of Bladder Cancer Across the European Union. , 2016, European urology.

[15]  Mark W. Ball,et al.  Five-year analysis of a multi-institutional prospective clinical trial of delayed intervention and surveillance for small renal masses: the DISSRM registry. , 2015, European urology.

[16]  P. Albertsen Observational studies and the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer , 2015, Current opinion in urology.

[17]  N. Lumen,et al.  Ablative Intravesical Chemotherapy for Small Recurrent Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Study , 2015, Urologia Internationalis.

[18]  F. Brimo,et al.  Prospective analysis of sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology and other urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer. , 2015, Urologic oncology.

[19]  J. Sandhu,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of management of low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using office-based fulguration. , 2015, Urology.

[20]  Danny Vesprini,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  M. Babjuk,et al.  EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. , 2013, European urology.

[23]  Md. Shad Akhtar,et al.  Active surveillance of small renal masses offers short‐term oncological efficacy equivalent to radical and partial nephrectomy , 2012, BJU international.

[24]  L. Martínez-Piñeiro,et al.  The EORTC tables overestimate the risk of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: external validation of the EORTC risk tables. , 2011, European urology.

[25]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. , 2010, European urology.

[26]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Active treatment of localized renal tumors may not impact overall survival in patients aged 75 years or older , 2010, Cancer.

[27]  B. Têtu,et al.  Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma from urine , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[28]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. , 2006, European urology.

[29]  O. Gofrit,et al.  Watchful waiting policy in recurrent Ta G1 bladder tumors. , 2006, European urology.

[30]  Peter L Choyke,et al.  The relationship between renal tumor size and metastases in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[31]  F. Kondylis,et al.  The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses , 2004, Cancer.

[32]  M. Soloway,et al.  Expectant management of small, recurrent, noninvasive papillary bladder tumors. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[33]  E. Satoh,et al.  Prediction of muscle invasion of bladder cancer by cystoscopy. , 2002, European urology.

[34]  H. Herr Does cystoscopy correlate with the histology of recurrent papillary tumours of the bladder? , 2001, BJU international.

[35]  E. Wallen,et al.  Conservative management of low risk superficial bladder tumors. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[36]  G. C. Chéchile Toniolo,et al.  [Is it necessary to always treat the relapses of superficial bladder tumour at the moment of diagnosis? Preliminary communication]. , 2005, Actas urologicas espanolas.