An Organizational Capability Framework for Earthquake Recovery

Engineering and construction capability affects the cost and pace of post-disaster recovery. An organizational capability framework for effective earthquake recovery was developed after studying longitudinally 15 engineering and construction organizations following the 2010/11 earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand. The longitudinal case studies, conducted from 2012 to 2015, revealed insights regarding the multitude of decisions that affected demands for engineering and construction post-earthquake, and thus the capability of organizations to meet demands. The framework presents five major challenges faced by organizations operating in an earthquake recovery environment and three core organizational capabilities required to address these challenges: disaster recovery know-how, organizational adaptive capacity to meet changing demands, and collective support among organizations. The findings offer real experience to help engineering and construction industries anticipate capability challenges and prepare for them as a business, as a sector, and as a partner with government agencies in a disaster management context.

[1]  KA Thleen,et al.  Building Theories from Case Study , 2007 .

[2]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[3]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION AFTER DISASTER , 2017 .

[4]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Post Disaster Reconstruction Research: An Industry Update , 2008 .

[5]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  An Exploration of the Construction Industry’s Role in Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery , 2006 .

[6]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Gauging the societal impacts of natural disasters using a capability approach. , 2010, Disasters.

[7]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Resourcing the Canterbury Rebuild: Issues and Outlook , 2012 .

[8]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[9]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[10]  Charles F. Dolan.  THE EFFECTS OF FLEXIBILITY IN EMPLOYEE SKILLS , EMPLOYEE BEHAVIORS , AND HR PRACTICES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE FORTHCOMING IN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT , 2004 .

[11]  Jennifer Duyne Barenstein,et al.  From Gujarat to Tamil Nadu: Owner-driven vs. contractor-driven housing reconstruction in India , 2008 .

[12]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Drug Discovery , 1994 .

[13]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Managing resources in disaster recovery projects , 2012 .

[14]  Miles Parker,et al.  The Economic Impact of the Canterbury Earthquakes , 2012 .

[15]  Malcolm James Beynon,et al.  Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[16]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[17]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[18]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Ground Motion and Seismic Source Aspects of the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence , 2014 .

[19]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[20]  Erica Seville,et al.  The role of insurance in organisational recovery following the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes , 2013 .

[21]  G. Krogh,et al.  Those Who Know, Do. Those Who Understand, Teach. Disseminative Capability and Knowledge Transfer in the Automotive Industry , 2014 .

[22]  Marianne Forman,et al.  Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) , 2011 .

[23]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[24]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[25]  Robert Kevin Grigsby.  "Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation" , 1996 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[28]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Does technological learning pay off? Inter-firm differences in technological capability-accumulation paths and operational performance improvement , 2002 .

[30]  Frederic Marquis,et al.  Post-Earthquake Assessment and Repairability of RC Buildings: Lessons from Canterbury and Emerging Challenges , 2015 .

[31]  Richard Lorch.  What lessons must be learned from the tsunami? , 2005 .

[32]  C. R. Raduan,et al.  The Effects of Organizational Resources, Capabilities and Systems on Competitive Advantage , 2012 .

[33]  George Ofori,et al.  CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT FOR DISASTER PREVENTION AND RESPONSE , 2002 .

[34]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Innovation Performance , 2013 .

[35]  Sarb Johal,et al.  Insurance: Its Role in Recovery from the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence , 2014 .

[36]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Adam Rose,et al.  Economic Resilience Lessons from the ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario , 2011 .

[38]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[39]  Teddy Boen,et al.  Observed Reconstruction of Houses in Aceh Seven Months after the Great Sumatra Earthquake and Indian Ocean Tsunami of December 2004 , 2006 .

[40]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[41]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[42]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Learning in organizations: HR implications and considerations , 2001 .

[43]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[44]  Quamrul Alam,et al.  Resource capability for local government in managing disaster , 2010 .

[45]  D. Gibson,et al.  The Effects of Flexibility in Employee Skills, Employee Behaviors, and Human Resource Practices on Firm Performance , 2005 .

[46]  Anjali Bakhru.  Creating and developing organisational capabilities: do we know more than we can say? , 2007 .

[47]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Resourcing challenges for post-disaster housing reconstruction: a comparative analysis , 2010 .

[48]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[49]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[50]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path , 2009 .

[52]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[53]  Craig Langston,et al.  Building capability for disaster resilience , 2012 .

[54]  Anna H. Olsen,et al.  Storm Surge to Demand Surge: Exploratory Study of Hurricanes, Labor Wages, and Material Prices , 2013 .

[55]  J. D. Bray,et al.  Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Land Damage for Residential Christchurch , 2014 .

[56]  Sultan Barakat,et al.  Housing Reconstruction as Socio-economic Recovery and State Building: Evidence from Southern Lebanon , 2011 .

[57]  Erica Seville,et al.  Preliminary observations of the impacts the 22 February Christchurch earthquake had on organisations and the economy , 2011 .

[58]  D. Barton.  Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation , 1995 .

[59]  B. Coriat,et al.  Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation , 2002 .

[60]  Jeffrey K. Lange,et al.  Review: Richard A. Krueger & Mary Anne Casey (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd edition) , 2002 .

[61]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Turning water into wine? Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in early-stage capitalization processes , 2015 .

[62]  Suahasil Nazara,et al.  Aceh-Nias Reconstruction and Rehabilitation: Progress and Challenges at the End of 2006 , 2007 .

[63]  Keith Porter,et al.  What We Know about Demand Surge: Brief Summary , 2011 .

[64]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Building resilience by focusing on legal and contractual frameworks for disaster reconstruction , 2008 .

[65]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[66]  Dilek Çetindamar,et al.  Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities , 2009 .

[67]  J. Aldás-Manzano,et al.  Individual Performance in Turbulent Environments: The Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Employee Flexibility , 2016 .

[68]  G. Schienstock.  Organizational Capabilities : Some reflections on the concept , 2009 .

[69]  S. Ketkar,et al.  Environmental dynamism, human resource flexibility, and firm performance: analysis of a multi-level causal model , 2010 .

[70]  Cinzia Battistella,et al.  Organisational capabilities for internal complexity: an exploration in the Coop stores , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[71]  Erk P. Piening.  Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations , 2013 .

[72]  Lei-Yu Wu,et al.  Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility , 2010 .

[73]  A. Amsden,et al.  Project Execution Capability, Organizational Know-how and Conglomerate Corporate Growth in Late Industrialization , 1994 .

[74]  R. Hall.  The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[75]  S. Winter,et al.  Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities , 2001 .

[76]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  A Dynamic Collaboration Capability as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[77]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Resource challenges for housing reconstruction , 2013 .

[78]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .