Importance effects on performance in event‐based prospective memory tasks

In the present study we manipulated the importance of performing two event‐based prospective memory tasks. In Experiment 1, the event‐based task was assumed to rely on relatively automatic processes, whereas in Experiment 2 the event‐based task was assumed to rely on a more demanding monitoring process. In contrast to the first experiment, the second experiment showed that importance had a positive effect on prospective memory performance. In addition, the occurrence of an importance effect on prospective memory performance seemed to be mainly due to the features of the prospective memory task itself, and not to the characteristics of the ongoing tasks that only influenced the size of the importance effect. The results suggest that importance instructions may improve prospective memory if the prospective task requires the strategic allocation of attentional monitoring resources.

[1]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Complex Prospective Memory and Executive Control of Working Memory: A Process Model , 2002 .

[2]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time - and event-based prospective memory , 2001, Memory.

[3]  Catina Feresin,et al.  Dissociating prospective memory from vigilance processes , 2001 .

[4]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Thomas W. Hancock,et al.  On the interaction of ongoing cognitive activity and the nature of an event‐based intention , 2000 .

[6]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework , 2000 .

[7]  G. Nigro,et al.  Influence of Importance of Intention on Prospective Memory Performance , 1998 .

[8]  P Shaw,et al.  Aging and prospective memory: the influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[9]  E. Maylor,et al.  Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[10]  J. Ellis.  Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. , 1996 .

[11]  J. L. Ellis,et al.  Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. , 1996 .

[12]  M. Brandimonte,et al.  The Effect of Cue-Familiarity, Cue-Distinctiveness, and Retention Interval on Prospective Remembering , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. , 1993, Memory.

[14]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Prospective memory skill , 1991 .

[15]  E. Winograd.  Some observations on prospective remembering , 1988 .

[16]  L. Kvavilashvili.  Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory , 1987 .

[17]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[18]  M. Macklin.  The Influence of Task Demands on Outcomes: Preliminary Findings and Theoretical Implications to Advertising Research Involving Children , 1983 .

[19]  H. Wellman,et al.  Young Children's Deliberate Reminding , 1983 .

[20]  J. Singer,et al.  Incentive Effects in Prospective Remembering , 1977 .