An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of project success

Abstract Organizations use projects to manage customized, one-off events across a wide range of functions. Project management is an essential operational tool and process that is utilized to effectively and efficiently manage resources, tasks and activities, and associated timelines. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the possibility that failure is a result of different interpretations of the criteria and factors used for success by multiple stakeholder groups. Currently, there is no recorded theory to determine project success within the project management literature, which includes both the perspective of multiple stakeholder groups and shared use of success dimensions for a given project. This omission is the basis of the current work, which explores the impact of using all stakeholder views as opposed to a selected few to define project success. The research outcomes are important for informed managerial decision making that enables the minimization of major financial losses.

[1]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Gower Handbook of Project Management , 1993 .

[2]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[3]  David Bryde,et al.  The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .

[4]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Rating defence major project success: The role of personal attributes and stakeholder relationships , 2014 .

[5]  Przemyslaw Lech,et al.  Time, Budget, And Functionality?—IT Project Success Criteria Revised , 2013, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[6]  Ron Basu Managing quality in projects: An empirical study , 2014 .

[7]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames , 2012 .

[8]  Mehrdad Moradi,et al.  Construction project success analysis from stakeholders theory perspective , 2012 .

[9]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  On the development of project management research: schools of thought and critique , 2002 .

[10]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[11]  A. Dahlan,et al.  Project implementation success and Change Management practices in Malaysian Government-linked companies (GLCs) , 2013 .

[12]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice , 2016 .

[13]  Mike Metcalfe,et al.  Complex project conceptualisation and argument mapping , 2013 .

[14]  J. R. Turner Evolution of project management research as evidenced by papers published in the International Journal of Project Management , 2010 .

[15]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[16]  J. Kirk,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1985 .

[17]  Zakaria Harun,et al.  Future criteria for success of building projects in Malaysia , 2011 .

[18]  Samuel R. Lucas Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research , 2014 .

[19]  Stephen G. MacDonell,et al.  A Perspective-Based Understanding of Project Success , 2012, ArXiv.

[20]  R. Burke Johnson,et al.  Research Methods Design and Analysis , 2010 .

[21]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  THE HANDBOOK OF PROJECT-BASED MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[22]  K. Davis Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success , 2014 .

[23]  Anandasivakumar Ekambaram,et al.  Stakeholder Benefit Assessment – Project Success through Management of Stakeholders , 2014 .

[24]  Pervez N. Ghauri,et al.  Research Methods in Business Studies , 2010 .

[25]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Systems Engineering to improve the governance in complex project environments , 2014 .

[26]  Samar Mouakket,et al.  A Classification Framework of Critical Success Factors for ERP Systems Implementation: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective , 2011, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[27]  K. Davis A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups , 2016 .

[28]  R. Müller,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[29]  Derek S. Thomson,et al.  A pilot study of client complexity, emergent requirements and stakeholder perceptions of project success , 2011 .

[30]  Georges Baume,et al.  Complex project conceptualization and the linguistic turn; the case of a small Australian construction company , 2015 .

[31]  Christophe Bredillet,et al.  Exploring Research in Project Management: Nine Schools of Project Management Research (Part 4) , 2008 .

[32]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  Project-Oriented Leadership , 2010 .

[33]  Levi Shaul,et al.  CSFs along ERP life-cycle in SMEs: a field study , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[34]  M. Sandelowski Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. , 1993, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[35]  Titus Ebenezer Kwofie,et al.  Determining Critical Project Success Criteria for Public Housing Building Projects (PHBPS) in Ghana , 2012 .

[36]  Rodney Turner,et al.  The Relationship between Project Success and Project Efficiency , 2015 .

[37]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[38]  Joanna Smith,et al.  Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research , 2015, Evidence-Based Nursing.

[39]  M. Johnson,et al.  Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research , 2000 .

[40]  J. Fereday,et al.  Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development , 2006 .

[41]  Christophe Bredillet,et al.  Exploring Research in Project Management: Nine Schools of Project Management Research (Part 2) , 2007 .

[42]  Stéphanie Missonier,et al.  Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology , 2014 .

[43]  G. Rolfe Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.