Flower architecture and sex determination: how does Atriplex halimus play with floral morphogenesis and sex genes?

•  Atriplex halimus , a monoecious Chenopodiaceae , produces flowers displaying two basic architectures. •  The first architectural pattern is made of staminate pentamerous flowers with an external whorl of yellowish tepals and an internal whorl of stamens. The second architectural pattern consists of female flowers with a single carpel enclosed within two opposite bracts. In both architectures, bisexual flowers and flowers of the un-expected sex were detected leading to the occurrence of up to six floral phenotypes on the same individual. •  Daylength and light intensity affected sex ratio and flower distribution between both architectural patterns. Short days and low light irradiance promoted femaleness and bracteate floral architecture. Flower position on a reproductive axis and geographical origin of the plant (genotype) also affected sex and architecture ratios. •  Thus, all the genetic information required for the production of both floral architecture and sexual organ types is present in each A. halimus plant but endogenous and environmental cues determine the fate of the floral meristems. These results are discussed in relation to classical models of genetic control of floral morphogenesis.

[1]  G. Angenent,et al.  Sex Determination in the Monoecious Species Cucumber Is Confined to Specific Floral Whorls , 2001, Plant Cell.

[2]  G. Theissen,et al.  Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. , 2001, Current opinion in plant biology.

[3]  Amel Talamali,et al.  Polygamie chez Atriplex halimus L. (Chenopodiaceae) , 2001 .

[4]  P. Darby,et al.  Sexual development and sex chromosomes in hop. , 2000, The New phytologist.

[5]  S. Strauss,et al.  Structure and expression of duplicate AGAMOUS orthologues in poplar , 2000, Plant Molecular Biology.

[6]  B. Davies,et al.  Beyond the ABCs: ternary complex formation in the control of floral organ identity. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[7]  S. Strauss,et al.  A DEFICIENS homolog from the dioecious tree black cottonwood is expressed in female and male floral meristems of the two-whorled, unisexual flowers. , 2000, Plant physiology.

[8]  C. Ainsworth,et al.  Boys and Girls Come Out to Play: The Molecular Biology of Dioecious Plants , 2000 .

[9]  M. Yanofsky,et al.  Three ways to learn the ABCs. , 2000, Current opinion in plant biology.

[10]  B. Ding,et al.  cDNA cloning and expression of a sweetgum gene that shows homology with Arabidopsis AGAMOUS , 1999 .

[11]  R. Perl-Treves,et al.  Expression of multiple AGAMOUS-like genes in male and female flowers of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). , 1998, Plant & cell physiology.

[12]  H. Korpelainen.  Labile sex expression in plants , 1998 .

[13]  M. Bliek,et al.  Genetic control of branching pattern and floral identity during Petunia inflorescence development. , 1998, Development.

[14]  P. Ruas,et al.  Male-specific DNA in the dioecious species Atriplex garrettii (Chenopodiaceae). , 1998, American journal of botany.

[15]  E. Coen,et al.  Inflorescence Commitment and Architecture in Arabidopsis , 1997, Science.

[16]  J. Hormaza,et al.  Pistillate and staminate flower development in dioecious Pistacia vera (Anacardiaceae) , 1996 .

[17]  V. Buchanan-Wollaston,et al.  Male and female flowers of the dioecious plant sorrel show different patterns of MADS box gene expression. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[18]  P. Schnable,et al.  Cloning and characterization of the maize An1 gene. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[19]  S. Dellaporta,et al.  The sex determination process in maize. , 1994, Science.

[20]  H. Saedler,et al.  Comparison of MADS box gene expression in developing male and female flowers of the dioecious plant white campion. , 1994, The Plant cell.

[21]  H. Saedler,et al.  Developmental differences between male and female flowers in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia , 1994 .

[22]  Elliot M. Meyerowitz,et al.  The ABCs of floral homeotic genes , 1994, Cell.

[23]  A. Spada,et al.  Development of male and female flower in Asparagus officinalis. Search for point of transition from hermaphroditic to unisexual developmental pathway , 1994, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[24]  N. Chua,et al.  Flower Development in Petunia. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[25]  R. Sherry,et al.  FLOWER DEVELOPMENT IN DIOECIOUS SPINACIA OLERACEA (CHENOPODIACEAE) , 1993 .

[26]  E. Coen,et al.  The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development , 1991, Nature.

[27]  W. Nacken,et al.  Genetic Control of Flower Development by Homeotic Genes in Antirrhinum majus , 1990, Science.

[28]  J. Bowman,et al.  Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. , 1989, The Plant cell.

[29]  D. C. Freeman.  Sex Expression in Atriplex canescens: Genetics and Environment , 1982, Botanical Gazette.

[30]  G. Bernier,et al.  Flowering in Xanthium strumarium: INITIATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF FEMALE INFLORESCENCE AND SEX EXPRESSION. , 1981, Plant physiology.

[31]  M. W. Parker,et al.  Influence of Light on Plant Growth , 1950 .

[32]  Hong Ma,et al.  Missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification , 2002 .

[33]  J. Doebley,et al.  Missing links : the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification , 2001 .

[34]  H. Ma,et al.  To be, or not to be, a flower--control of floral meristem identity. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  D Weigel,et al.  The genetics of flower development: from floral induction to ovule morphogenesis. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[36]  R. Durand,et al.  Sex determination and reproductive organ differentiation in Mercurialis , 1991 .

[37]  T. Bisalputra.  Anatomical and morphological studies in the Chenopodiaceae. I. Inflorescence of Atriplex and Bassia , 1960 .