Striated acto-myosin fibers can reorganize and register in response to elastic interactions with the matrix.

The remarkable striation of muscle has fascinated many for centuries. In developing muscle cells, as well as in many adherent, nonmuscle cell types, striated, stress fiberlike structures with sarcomere-periodicity tend to register: Based on several studies, neighboring, parallel fibers at the basal membrane of cultured cells establish registry of their respective periodic sarcomeric architecture, but, to our knowledge, the mechanism has not yet been identified. Here, we propose for cells plated on an elastic substrate or adhered to a neighboring cell, that acto-myosin contractility in striated fibers close to the basal membrane induces substrate strain that gives rise to an elastic interaction between neighboring striated fibers, which in turn favors interfiber registry. Our physical theory predicts a dependence of interfiber registry on externally controllable elastic properties of the substrate. In developing muscle cells, registry of striated fibers (premyofibrils and nascent myofibrils) has been suggested as one major pathway of myofibrillogenesis, where it precedes the fusion of neighboring fibers. This suggests a mechanical basis for the optimal myofibrillogenesis on muscle-mimetic elastic substrates that was recently observed by several groups in cultures of mouse-, human-, and chick-derived muscle cells.

[1]  Shinji Deguchi,et al.  Biomechanical properties of actin stress fibers of non-motile cells. , 2009, Biorheology.

[2]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  S. Safran,et al.  Dynamical theory of active cellular response to external stress. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  J. Sanger,et al.  Costameres are sites of force transmission to the substratum in adult rat cardiomyocytes , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Elastic interactions of active cells with soft materials. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[7]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[8]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[9]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  Aiping Du,et al.  How to build a myofibril , 2006, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[11]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[12]  Samuel A. Safran,et al.  Dynamics of cell orientation , 2007 .

[13]  F. Schöck,et al.  The initial steps of myofibril assembly: integrins pave the way , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of poisson ratio on cellular structure formation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  Alain Richert,et al.  Real-time single-cell response to stiffness , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[18]  H. Augustin,et al.  Tensional forces in fibrillar extracellular matrices control directional capillary sprouting. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[19]  J. Sanger,et al.  The premyofibril: evidence for its role in myofibrillogenesis. , 1994, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[20]  N. Socci,et al.  Derivation of Multipotent Mesenchymal Precursors from Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[21]  Elisa Cimetta,et al.  Soft substrates drive optimal differentiation of human healthy and dystrophic myotubes. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[22]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  John V. Small,et al.  Mechanosensing in actin stress fibers revealed by a close correlation between force and protein localization , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[24]  Y. Wang,et al.  Formation and alignment of Z lines in living chick myotubes microinjected with rhodamine-labeled alpha-actinin , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  J C Perriard,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis in the developing chicken heart: assembly of Z-disk, M-line and the thick filaments. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[27]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Sarcomere mechanics in capillary endothelial cells. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Aiping Du,et al.  Cardiac myofibrillogenesis inside intact embryonic hearts. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[29]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Myoblast morphology and organization on biochemically micro-patterned hydrogel coatings under cyclic mechanical strain. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[30]  Thomas A Rando,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase is essential for costamerogenesis in cultured skeletal muscle cells. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[31]  J. Sanger,et al.  Myofibrillogenesis visualized in living embryonic cardiomyocytes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  G. Pharr,et al.  Effective elastic modulus of film-on-substrate systems under normal and tangential contact , 2008 .

[33]  S. Safran,et al.  Nematic order by elastic interactions and cellular rigidity sensing , 2010, 1009.5101.

[34]  Keith Burridge,et al.  Simultaneous stretching and contraction of stress fibers in vivo. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[35]  U. S. Schwarz,et al.  Coupling biochemistry and mechanics in cell adhesion: a model for inhomogeneous stress fiber contraction , 2007, 0707.2551.

[36]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[37]  H. Mellor,et al.  Actin stress fibres , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[38]  Frederick Lanni,et al.  Internet-based image analysis quantifies contractile behavior of individual fibroblasts inside model tissue. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[39]  M. Russell,et al.  Early incorporation of obscurin into nascent sarcomeres: implication for myofibril assembly during cardiac myogenesis , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[40]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Elastic interactions of cells. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[41]  S. Safran,et al.  Limitation of cell adhesion by the elasticity of the extracellular matrix. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[44]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .