Earthquake recurrence as a record breaking process

[1] Extending the central concept of recurrence times for a point process to recurrent events in space-time allows us to characterize seismicity as a record breaking process using only spatiotemporal relations among events. Linking record breaking events with edges between nodes in a graph generates a complex dynamical network isolated from any length, time or magnitude scales set by the observer. For Southern California, the network of recurrences reveals new statistical features of seismicity with robust scaling laws. The rupture length and its scaling with magnitude emerges as a generic measure for distance between recurrent events. Further, the relative separations for subsequent records in space (or time) form a hierarchy with unexpected scaling properties.

[1]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Aftershock Zone Scaling , 2002 .

[2]  Ned Glick,et al.  Breaking Records and Breaking Boards , 1978 .

[3]  Marco Baiesi,et al.  Scaling and precursor motifs in earthquake networks , 2004, cond-mat/0406198.

[4]  Alvaro Corral.  Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[5]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[6]  Christian Goltz,et al.  Decomposing spatio-temporal seismicity patterns , 2001 .

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[8]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  Kim Christensen,et al.  Unified scaling law for earthquakes. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[10]  Kristy F. Tiampo,et al.  Mean-field threshold systems and phase dynamics: An application to earthquake fault systems , 2002 .

[11]  P. Shearer,et al.  Comprehensive waveform cross-correlation of southern California seismograms: Part 2. Event locations obtained using cluster analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Maya Paczuski,et al.  Analysis of the spatial distribution between successive earthquakes. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[13]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault systems , 2003 .

[14]  M. Wyss,et al.  Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan , 2000 .

[15]  J. B. Rundle,et al.  Self-organization in leaky threshold systems: The influence of near-mean field dynamics and its implications for earthquakes, neurobiology, and forecasting , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Christian Goltz,et al.  Are seismic waiting time distributions universal , 2004 .

[17]  Maya Paczuski,et al.  Complex networks of earthquakes and aftershocks , 2004, physics/0408018.

[18]  Joachim Krug,et al.  Breaking records in the evolutionary race , 2004, q-bio/0409019.

[19]  Alvaro Corral.  Local distributions and rate fluctuations in a unified scaling law for earthquakes. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.