Policy sensitive mode choice analysis of Port-Said City, Egypt

Abstract This paper aimed at developing advanced Logit discrete choice models with several individual and mode attributes affecting the prediction of individual choice. The models have been applied to Port-Said (PS) city and have been used to investigate innovative transport systems such as Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as a hypothetical mode situation beside the regular modes of transport (car and taxi). The methodology provides data collection of PS transportation mode system and develops Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), Nested Logit Model (NL), and Mixed Logit Model (MXL) using Visual-tm Software. The survey was formed by the Stated Preference (SP) technique conducted for individuals from all PS zones and the predictable travel mode choice behavior was analyzed. The findings showed that in PS, income is the most important attribute affecting the mode choice behavior model. The high values and positive signs of income parameters indicate that the higher income earners are more likely to use private car than taxi or bus. Contrary to most cases in developed countries, out-of-vehicle time that represents the accessibility shows higher impacts than the in-vehicle time as a result of poor access facilities in developing countries.

[1]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Distributional Assumptions in Mixed Logit Models , 2006 .

[3]  M. Bierlaire The Network GEV model , 2002 .

[4]  H R Kerali,et al.  An integrated model for quantifying accessibility-benefits in developing countries , 2001 .

[5]  C. Bhat Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model , 2001 .

[6]  Jonathan M. Bunker,et al.  Modelling Passenger Mode Choice Behaviour Using Computer Aided Stated Preference Data : Report No. 2 , 2004 .

[7]  J. Howe Transport for the poor or poor transport? A general review of rural transport policy in developing countries with emphasis on low-income areas. , 1997 .

[8]  David M Levinson,et al.  Access to Destinations: Development of Accessibility Measures , 2006 .

[9]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions , 2011 .

[10]  D. Hartfiel,et al.  Understanding , 2003 .

[11]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[12]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1987 .

[13]  D. Hensher,et al.  Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence , 2010 .

[14]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[15]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[16]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Incorporating Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Urban Work Travel Mode Choice Modeling , 2000, Transp. Sci..