Fossil electricity and CO2 sequestration: how natural gas prices, initial conditions and retrofits determine the cost of controlling CO2 emissions

Stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations will require significant cuts in electric sector carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The ability to capture and sequester CO2 in a manner compatible with today's fossil-fuel based power generation infrastructure offers a potentially low-cost contribution to a larger climate change mitigation strategy. The extent to which carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies might lower the cost of CO2 control in competitive electric markets will depend on how they displace existing generating units in a system's dispatch order, as well as on their competitiveness with abatement alternatives. This paper assumes a perspective intermediate to the more common macro-economic or plant-level analyses of CCS and employs an electric system dispatch model to examine how natural gas prices, sunk capital, and the availability of coal plant retrofits affect CCS economics. Despite conservative assumptions about cost, CCS units are seen to provide significant reductions in baseload CO2 emissions at a carbon price below 100$/tC. In addition, the ability to retrofit coal plants for post-combustion CO2 capture is not seen to lower the overall cost of CO2 abatement.

[1]  W. Patterson Energy policy , 1978, Nature.

[2]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  A Multi-Pollutant Framework for Evaluating CO2 Control Options for Fossil Fuel Power Plants , 2001 .

[3]  R. Turvey,et al.  Electricity Economics: Essays and Case Studies , 1977 .

[4]  Joseph F. DeCarolis,et al.  The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world , 2006 .

[5]  James R. McFarland,et al.  Incorporating carbon capture and storage technologies in integrated assessment models , 2006 .

[6]  H. Herzog,et al.  ECONOMIC MODELING OF CO 2 CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION , 2000 .

[7]  Anthony Fainberg,et al.  The Energy sourcebook : a guide to technology, resources, and policy , 1991 .

[8]  J. David,et al.  Economic evaluation of leading technology options for sequestration of carbon dioxide , 2000 .

[9]  Kristin Rypdal,et al.  Geological CO2 Storage as a Climate Change Mitigation Option , 2005 .

[10]  Arthur H. Rosenfeld,et al.  ENGINEERING-ECONOMIC STUDIES OF ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Opportunities and Challenges , 1998 .

[11]  W. D. Gunter,et al.  Economics of CO2 Sequestration in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs , 2000 .

[12]  Sam Holloway,et al.  STORAGE OF FOSSIL FUEL-DERIVED CARBON DIOXIDE BENEATH THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH , 2001 .

[13]  R. Righter Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System , 1999 .

[14]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[15]  Ronald R. Kline,et al.  Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility Industry. Richard F. Hirsh , 2001 .

[16]  J. Mcgowan,et al.  WINDPOWER: A Turn of the Century Review , 2000 .

[17]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[18]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[19]  QK Ahmad,et al.  Climate change 1995. Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 1997 .

[20]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Estimating the costs of mitigating greenhouse gases , 1996 .

[21]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Dynamics of energy technologies and global change , 1999 .

[22]  D. W. Keith Is the Answer to Climate Change Mitigation Blowing in the Wind ? , 2003 .

[23]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  The competition between coal and natural gas the importance of sunk costs , 1996 .