Early treatment of incipient carious lesions: a two-year clinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to quantify conservation of tooth structure and evaluate the efficacy of early treatment of questionable carious lesions in pits and fissures of posterior teeth using air abrasion followed by placement of preventive resin restorations. METHODS Ninety-three patients with 223 questionably carious teeth, mainly with darkly stained pits and fissures, were recruited from general dentistry clinics. After baseline evaluation, each tooth was randomly assigned to either an early treatment or control group. The authors used air abrasion to investigate the pits and fissures of teeth in the early treatment group. The teeth were sealed and restored with a flowable resin-based composite. All teeth in both groups were examined at six-month intervals to clinically evaluate the quality of the restorations and the caries status of the control teeth. RESULTS After two years, two of the 113 restorations in the early treatment group required further treatment because of penetrating stain at a margin. In the control group, 14 teeth required treatment because of caries. The mean weight of the impression material--a surrogate measure of volume of removed tooth structure--in preparations that extended into dentin in the early treatment group was 0.0260 grams compared with 0.0281 g in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the impression weights (P = .390). CONCLUSION After two years of a proposed five-year study, the authors concluded that conservation of tooth structure was not substantiated by early treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Treating questionable carious lesions early may not conserve tooth structure.

[1]  Kotlow La New technology in pediatric dentistry. , 1996 .

[2]  J. Powers,et al.  Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. , 1995, Operative dentistry.

[3]  G. Christensen Initial carious lesions: when should they be restored? , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  A. Morrison,et al.  Evaluation of the airdent unit: preliminary report. , 1953, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  J. C. Hamilton,et al.  A clinical evaluation of air-abrasion treatment of questionable carious lesions. A 12-month report. , 2001, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Using air-abrasive technology to diagnose and restore pit and fissure caries. , 1995, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  W. Eakle,et al.  Air abrasion: an old technology reborn. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[8]  D. McComb,et al.  Caries-detector dyes--how accurate and useful are they? , 2000, Journal.

[9]  O. Yassin In vitro studies of the effect of a dental explorer on the formation of an artificial carious lesion. , 1995, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[10]  R. Hickel,et al.  Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[11]  D. Birkhed,et al.  Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. , 1998, Swedish dental journal.

[12]  J C GREENE,et al.  THE SIMPLIFIED ORAL HYGIENE INDEX. , 1964, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  G Ryge,et al.  Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  Light microscope study of the effect of probing in occlusal surfaces. , 1987, Caries research.

[15]  E. Berry,et al.  Bond strength of resin composite to air-abraded enamel. , 1995, Quintessence international.

[16]  H. Löe,et al.  PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. I. PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY. , 1963, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.