A fractal analysis of pyramidal neurons in mammalian motor cortex

Pyramidal neurons in the mammalian cerebral cortex can be described by a fractal dimension (Mandelbrot, 1982), which is an objective, quantitative measure of the complexity of their soma/dendritic borders. In the cat, the fractal dimensions of lamina V cells, which include pyramidal tract neurons (PTN), indicate that these cells are more complex than other pyramidal neurons (PN) in the same region of motor cortex. The lamina V cells of the cat are also more complex than those in motor cortex of the monkey. Moreover, lamina III neurons in the monkey are more complex than monkey lamina V neurons. The fractal dimension of the intracortical axon collateral arborizations of the same pyramidal neurons indicated, in all cases, that the branching of these terminals is less complex than the branching of the dendrites of the same cells. In line with the observation that the fractal dimensions of some homologous cellular populations are different in different species, it is suggested that the fractal dimension and the degree of morphological complexity may relate to the requirement for the number of separable functions to be accommodated within one neuron. For example, as the size of the cortex and the number of neurons in a region increase, the opportunity exists within a given cortical zone, for individual functions to be segregated and for functional specialization to be accommodated with less morphological complexity of the individual neurons performing each of these functions.

[1]  J. Jack,et al.  An electrical description of the motoneurone, and its application to the analysis of synaptic potentials , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R Porter,et al.  Morphology of pyramidal neurones in monkey motor cortex and the synaptic actions of their intracortical axon collaterals. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  J. Yokota,et al.  Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkey , 1981, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  Peter H. Richter,et al.  The Beauty of Fractals , 1988, 1988.

[5]  R. Porter,et al.  Morphology of neurons in area 4γ of the cat's cortex studied with intracellular injection of HRP , 1988 .

[6]  W. Rall Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. , 1962, Biophysical journal.

[7]  W. B. Marks,et al.  A fractal analysis of cell images , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  W. B. Marks,et al.  A fractal analysis of cultured rat optic nerve glial growth and differentiation , 1991, Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Ramón-Moliner,et al.  An attempt at classifying nerve cells on the basis of their dendritic patterns , 1962, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  R. Porter,et al.  Corticomotoneuronal synapses in the monkey: Light microscopic localization upon motoneurons of intrinsic muscles of the hand , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  M. Descheˆnes,et al.  Morphological characterization of slow and fast pyramidal tract cells in the cat , 1979, Brain Research.

[12]  A. G. Flook The use of dilation logic on the quantimet to achieve fractal dimension characterisation of textured and structured profiles , 1978 .

[13]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[14]  P. Schwindt,et al.  Two transient potassium currents in layer V pyramidal neurones from cat sensorimotor cortex. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Y. Shinoda,et al.  Multiple axon collaterals of single corticospinal axons in the cat spinal cord. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  R Porter,et al.  Corticocortical synaptic influences on morphologically identified pyramidal neurones in the motor cortex of the monkey. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  S P Wise,et al.  Size, laminar and columnar distribution of efferent cells in the sensory‐motor cortex of monkeys , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.