Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval

According to the multi-process model of prospective memory (McDaniel & Einstein, 2000), performance in a prospective memory task may be due to spontaneous retrieval processes or due to strategic monitoring. Spontaneous retrieval is typically accompanied by a pop up experience and strategic monitoring by a search experience. In this study we report two experiments with young adults in which we systematically investigated whether retrieval experience differed across experimental conditions. In Experiment 1 some prospective memory targets were preceded by associated primes. We expected that presenting primes would enhance performance by an automatic activation of the intention and hence lead to an increase in pop up experiences. In Experiment 2 half of the participants received instructions containing information about the specific context in which the prospective memory task would occur, whereas the other half of the participants received no such information. We expected that specific context instructions would enhance performance by legitimate anticipation of the prospective memory task and hence would lead to an increase in search experiences. The results confirmed these expectations. They indicate that the assessment of retrieval experience can provide valuable insights into the processes underlying prospective memory performance. They also suggest that retrieval experience can vary systematically across experimental situations as predicted by the multi-process model.

[1]  Peter Graf,et al.  Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory tests , 2000 .

[2]  R. Marsh,et al.  Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[5]  P. Graf,et al.  Prospective Memory: A New Focus for Research , 2001, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  J. L. Ellis,et al.  Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. , 1996 .

[7]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Importance effects on performance in event‐based prospective memory tasks , 2004, Memory.

[8]  S. L. Richardson,et al.  Aging and prospective memory: examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  L. Kvavilashvili Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory , 1987 .

[11]  Peter Graf,et al.  Implicit Memory: It Is Prime Time@@@Implicit Memory: New Directions in Cognition, Development, and Neuropsychology , 1995 .

[12]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Prospective memory: When reminders fail , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Retrieval processes in prospective memory : Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings , 1996 .

[14]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework , 2000 .

[15]  Catina Feresin,et al.  Dissociating prospective memory from vigilance processes , 2001 .

[16]  U. Bayen,et al.  A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory , 1980 .

[18]  A. Chasteen,et al.  Implementation Intentions and Facilitation of Prospective Memory , 2001, Psychological science.

[19]  R. Marsh,et al.  The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Melissa J. Guynn,et al.  A two‐process model of strategic monitoring in event‐based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking , 2003 .

[21]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  F. Craik,et al.  Age-related decline in prospective memory: the roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[23]  M. Brandimonte,et al.  The Effect of Cue-Familiarity, Cue-Distinctiveness, and Retention Interval on Prospective Remembering , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  E. Balint Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[25]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Changes in Event-Based Prospective Memory Across Adulthood , 1998 .

[26]  T. Mäntylä,et al.  Priming effects in prospective memory. , 1993, Memory.

[27]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Memory for intentions: The effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity , 1971 .

[29]  K. Dismukes,et al.  Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing , 2005, Memory.

[30]  D. Schacter Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[31]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[32]  Rebekah E. Smith The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[34]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Ask and ye shall receive : Behavioural specificity in the accuracy of subjective memory complaints , 2000 .

[35]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[36]  D. Messer,et al.  Prospective memory in children: the effects of age and task interruption. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[37]  K. Cherry,et al.  Age and individual differences influence prospective memory. , 1999, Psychology and Aging.

[38]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Normal aging and prospective memory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The relationship between prospective memory and retrospective memory: neuropsychological evidence , 1997 .

[40]  K. Cherry,et al.  The Effects of Age, Ability, and Memory Monitoring on Prospective Memory Task Performance , 2002 .

[41]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[42]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  The influence of partial‐match cues on event‐based prospective memory , 2004, Memory.

[43]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  J. Ellis,et al.  Retrieval Cue Specificity and the Realization of Delayed Intentions , 1996 .