Increased turning per unit distance as an area‐restricted search mechanism in a pause‐travel predator, juvenile plaice, foraging for buried bivalves

During searching, discovery of a prey patch by juvenile plaice Pleuronectes platessa was associated with a change from extensive to intensive search behaviour several moves before an attack on a prey. Intensive search behaviour was characterized by reduced distance of moves, a greater rate of turning per unit distance and shorter pauses between moves. The increase in turn rate was associated with area-restricted seaching, while a decrease in distances moved suggests that plaice search more efficiently for prey when stationary than while moving. The klinokinetic mechanism that appears to regulate search behaviour in juvenile plaice should allow efficient exploitation of a range of prey distribution patterns based on localized cues alone. Such a mechanism is especially useful to a migratory predator, like plaice, whose foraging is subject to time constraints imposed by tidally available feeding areas.

[1]  M. Burrows,et al.  The effects of food, predation risk and endogenous rhythmicity on the behaviour of juvenile plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L. , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  M. Burrows,et al.  Effects of endogenous rhythms and light conditions on foraging and predator‐avoidance in juvenile plaice , 1994 .

[3]  M. Noda,et al.  Local prey search based on spatial memory and expectation in the planktivorous reef fish, Chromis chrysurus (Pomacentridae) , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  M. Burrows Foraging time strategy of small juvenile plaice: a laboratory study of diel and tidal behaviour patterns with Artemia prey and shrimp predators , 1994 .

[5]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Efficiency of area-concentrated searching behaviour in a continuous patchy environment* , 1992 .

[6]  Thomas Getty,et al.  Random Prey Detection with Pause-Travel Search , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[7]  S. Thrush Spatial patterns in soft-bottom communities. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  V. Fourcassié,et al.  Search behavior and foraging ecology of the ant Formica schaufussi: colony-level and individual patterns , 1991 .

[9]  S. Benhamou,et al.  How animals use their environment: a new look at kinesis , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  P. Chesson,et al.  Sunfish foraging among patches: the patch-departure decision , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Search Cycle of Planktivorous Arctic Graylings Thymallus arcticus , 1988 .

[13]  T. Guilford,et al.  Search images not proven: A reappraisal of recent evidence , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  A new view of the predation cycle of a planktivorous fish, white crappie (Pomoxis annularis) , 1986 .

[15]  R. Gibson,et al.  A comparison of predatory behaviour in flatfish , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  A. Mcintyre,et al.  The food and growth of 0-group flatfish on nursery grounds in the Clyde Sea Area , 1983 .

[17]  J. Staddon,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: The Effect of Search Rate , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[18]  M. Pienkowski,et al.  Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  J. Janssen Comparison of Searching Behavior for Zooplankton in an Obligate Planktivore, Blueback Herring (Alosa aestivalis) and a Facultative Planktivore, Bluegill (Lepomis machrochirus) , 1982 .

[20]  A. Hodgson STUDIES ON WOUND HEALING AND REGENERATION OF THE SIPHONS OF THE BIVALVE DONAX SERRA (RÖDING) , 1982 .

[21]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Prey Distribution as a Factor Determining the Choice of Optimal Foraging Strategy , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[22]  M. Andersson On optimal predator search , 1981 .

[23]  S. Lockwood,et al.  The daily food intake of 0-group plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) under natural conditions , 1980 .

[24]  R. Gibson,et al.  A quantitative description of the behaviour of wild juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  D. Olton,et al.  Food-searching strategies in young rats: Win-shift predominates over win-stay. , 1978 .

[26]  J. Wiens Population Responses to Patchy Environments , 1976 .

[27]  J. Wilson Dispersion of Tellina tenuis from Kames Bay, Millport, Scotland , 1976 .

[28]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[29]  G. Thomas,et al.  The influences of encountering a food object on subsequent searching behaviour in Gasterosteus aculeatus L , 1974 .

[30]  J. Hunter,et al.  Effect of Prey Distribution and Density on the Searching and Feeding Behaviour of Larval Anchovy Engraulis mordax Girard , 1974 .

[31]  S. Groot On the interrelationships between morphology of the alimentary tract, food and feeding behaviour in flatfishes (pisces: pleuronectiformes) , 1971 .

[32]  J. Steele,et al.  The ecology of 0-group plaice and common dabs at Loch Ewe I. Population and food , 1968 .

[33]  J. Blaxter,et al.  Light intensity, vision, and feeding in young plaice , 1968 .

[34]  J. Beukema Predation by the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): the influence of hunger and experience. , 1968, Behaviour.

[35]  N. Tinbergen,et al.  An Experiment On Spacing-Out as a Defence Against Predation , 1967 .

[36]  N. Holme Population-dispersion in Tellina Tenuis da Costa , 1950, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.