Crossing the Street Across the Globe: A Study on the Effects of eHMI on Pedestrians in the US, Germany and China

Automated vehicles (AVs) will be integrated into mixed traffic within the next few years. To replace human-human communication, different external human machine interfaces (eHMI) have been proposed. Interpretation of HMIs can be subject to cultural influences. To examine the potential of eHMIs across different cultures, as well as research the transferability of study results, three virtual reality studies were conducted in Germany, the United Stated and China. In all studies, participants had the role of pedestrians and had to recognize if an AV is yielding or passing the pedestrian. Two eHMIs, a light-band and a display were used to inform pedestrians of the AV’s intention. When yielding to the pedestrian, eHMI showed benefits in terms of intention recognition in Germany and the United States. In China, however, eHMI did not show these effects. Results consistently show across all cultures, that eHMI deteriorates pedestrians’ recognition of the AVs intention to pass and not yield. The authors conclude that eHMI should only be used in already safe states of the AV, such as when yielding. In addition, eHMIs should not be introduced into a different culture without considering necessary cultural adaptations. For testing eHMIs internationally, there is a need to carefully select comparable traffic scenarios. These scenarios have to take into account habitual behavioral patterns of the current traffic and therefore the learned behavior of road users as to what they expect to happen in such situations.

[1]  David Murray,et al.  Towards cultural translation of websites: a large-scale study of Australian, Chinese, and Saudi Arabian design preferences , 2017, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Using the Driving Behavior of an Automated Vehicle to Communicate Intentions - A Wizard of Oz Study , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[3]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Good computing systems for everyone – how on earth? Cultural aspects , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Michael P. Clamann,et al.  Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[5]  R L Helmreich,et al.  National culture and flight deck automation: results of a multination survey. , 1997, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[6]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Pedestrian gestures increase driver yielding at uncontrolled mid-block road crossings. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Can Interfaces Facilitate Communication in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction? , 2018, HRI.

[8]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Will There Be New Communication Needs When Introducing Automated Vehicles to the Urban Context , 2017 .

[9]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  Naturalistic Observation of Interactions Between Car Drivers and Pedestrians in High Density Urban Settings , 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.

[10]  Berthold Färber,et al.  Communication and Communication Problems Between Autonomous Vehicles and Human Drivers , 2016 .

[11]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  Crossing at a red light: Behaviour of individuals and groups , 2009 .

[12]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[13]  Jonas Andersson,et al.  Hello Human, can you read my mind? , 2017, ERCIM News.

[14]  Malte Risto,et al.  The social behavior of autonomous vehicles , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[15]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taxonomy of Traffic Situations for the Interaction between Automated Vehicles and Human Road Users , 2017 .

[17]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  External HMIs and Their Effect on the Interaction Between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles , 2018, IHSI.

[18]  Christian Berger,et al.  The Best Rated Human–Machine Interface Design for Autonomous Vehicles in the 2016 Grand Cooperative Driving Challenge , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  Lenja Sorokin,et al.  A Change of Perspective: Designing the Automated Vehicle as a New Social Actor in a Public Space , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Detlef Zühlke,et al.  Global Demands of non-european Markets for the Design of User-Interfaces , 1999, MMI Interakt..

[22]  Sowmya Somanath,et al.  Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction , 2018, CHI.

[23]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[24]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  Laboruntersuchung zur potenziellen Sicherheitswirkung einer vorderen Bremsleuchte in Pkw , 2017 .