Objects of Design: Activity Theory as an analytical framework for Design and Social Innovation

Design and social innovation is a developing field of study. The current lack of critical analysis of initiatives and the dominance of insights and methods from European cases in academic literature are not sufficient to construct an image that could be considered as comprehensive. This paper aims to address both issues by introducing Activity Theory as an analytical framework, as its ability to examine phenomena in their native context through multiple perspectives is considered to be well-suited to study design and social innovation initiatives. The analysis of data obtained during a field study investigating three social initiatives in Bangkok contributed to understanding how they work and why they exist, in addition to highlighting the influence of the Thai social and cultural context on the role of design in the social innovation process.

[1]  F. Blackler.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[2]  Carla Cipolla,et al.  Social Innovation in Brazil Through Design Strategy , 2011 .

[3]  Gordon Wells,et al.  Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom , 1993 .

[4]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[5]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[6]  A. Meroni,et al.  Design for Social Innovation as a form of Design Activism: An action format , 2013 .

[7]  Ryo Sakurai,et al.  Out of Scandinavia to Asia: adaptability of participatory design in culturally distant society , 2012, PDC '12.

[8]  Emmanouil Chatzakis,et al.  Maintaining agility : a study of obscure New Product Development practices in small and medium sized manufacturing enterprises to understand how they maintain relevance to their markets , 2015 .

[9]  Gavin Melles,et al.  An activity theory focused case study of graphic designers’ tool-mediated activities during the conceptual design phase , 2010 .

[10]  G. Mulgan,et al.  The open book of social innovation , 2010 .

[11]  B. Latour.  On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications, Plus More Than a Few Complications , 2017 .

[12]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation , 2011 .

[13]  Tim Brown,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation , 2010 .

[14]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[15]  R. Lulham,et al.  Co-designing out crime , 2011 .

[16]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[17]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation , 2015 .

[18]  Lorraine Gamman,et al.  Design with society: why socially responsive design is good enough , 2011 .

[19]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[20]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Collaborative services. Social innovation and design for sustainability , 2008 .

[21]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[22]  Kristina Lauche,et al.  Collaboration Among Designers: Analysing an Activity for System Development , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[24]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[25]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Articulating User Needs in Collaborative Design: Towards an Activity-Theoretical Approach , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[26]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Toward a Participatory Design Approach to Service Design , 2004 .

[27]  Hans Radder,et al.  Normative Reflexions on Constructivist Approaches to Science and Technology , 1992 .

[28]  Terry Irwin,et al.  Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research , 2015 .

[29]  Y. Akama,et al.  Seeking stronger plurality: Intimacy and integrity in designing for social innovation , 2016 .

[30]  T. Barnwell,et al.  The collective articulation of issues as design practice , 2011 .

[31]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[32]  Emma Jefferies,et al.  Transformations: 7 Roles to Drive Change by Design , 2017 .