Determinants of knowledge sharing behavior

In the new global knowledge has become a central issue for organization’s survival. Recently, in knowledge management (KM)-related research effective knowledge sharing (KS) is considered as a significant component of KM success. The importance of knowledge sharing in knowledge management can be interpreted as a blood circulating in the body. There has been a dramatically interest in examining the factors that encourage or hamper individual’s knowledge sharing behavior in social network. Some theories such as Social Exchange Theory (SET), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), Theory of Planned Behavior (TBP), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) are vastly used to understand human behavior and are also considered as a critical base to understand individual’s knowledge sharing behavior. For the present research, the authors intend to review the previous researches that explored different factors effect on knowledge sharing behavior. So, the purpose of this paper is to review recent research in KS determinants to find out the most important factors which influence KS behavior. This will help us to understand how various examined factors influence knowledge sharing behavior and how different perspectives could correctly formulate the knowledge sharing behavior. The paper first gives a brief overview of the recent history of KS, and some social-psychological models, which have been applied for determining the KS behavior and finally gives suggestions for future scholars who are interested to study more efficient in this area.

[1]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Joon Koh,et al.  An Integrative Model for Knowledge Sharing in Communities-of-Practice , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  M. Hitt,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management , 2003 .

[4]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[5]  M. Fischetti Working knowledge. , 2003, Scientific American.

[6]  C. Huntley,et al.  Ramping up the Organizational Learning Curve: Assessing the Impact of Deliberate Learning on Organizational Performance Under Gainsharing , 2005 .

[7]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[8]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[11]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[12]  N. Smelser,et al.  Annual Review of Sociology , 1975 .

[13]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Shih-Feng Hsu,et al.  Knowledge sharing: game and reasoned action perspectives , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[15]  Nor Laila Md. Noor,et al.  Community Acceptance of Knowledge Sharing System in the Travel and Tourism Websites: an Application of an Extension of TAM , 2005, ECIS.

[16]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[18]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[19]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Social exchange, social capital and information sharing in online environments: lessons from three case studies , 2008 .

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  Five steps to creating a global knowledge-sharing system: Siemens' ShareNet , 2005 .

[22]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy , 1998 .

[23]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[24]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[25]  LinHsiu-Fen Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007 .

[26]  Gwo-Guang Lee,et al.  Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge‐sharing behaviour , 2004 .

[27]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  Sheng Wu,et al.  Exploring Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Teams: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[29]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.