Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to compare the performance of positron emission mammography (PEM) with that of MRI in the evaluation of the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Four hundred seventy-two women with newly diagnosed breast cancer offered breast-conserving surgery from September 2006 through November 2008 consented to participate in a multicenter protocol. Participants underwent contrast-enhanced breast MRI and 18F-FDG PEM in randomized order, and the examinations were interpreted independently. The performance characteristics of the imaging modalities were compared using the McNemar test and generalized estimating equations. A retrospective blinded review of PEM images was performed by four experienced observers to understand the reasons for false-negatives. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-seven women (median age, 58 years; age range, 26-93 years) eligible for analysis completed the appropriate follow-up for study inclusion. Fifteen women (4.1%) were found to have contralateral cancer (11 invasive [mean tumor size, 12 mm; median, 10 mm; range, 1-22 mm] and four ductal carcinoma in situ). Of the 15 cases, both PEM and MRI showed three (20%), only MRI showed 11 (73%), and one (6.7%) was found at prophylactic mastectomy. MRI sensitivity at 14 of 15 (93%; 95% CI, 66-94) was higher than PEM at three of 15 (20%; 95% CI, 5.3-46) (p<0.001). On PEM, three additional cancers were seen prospectively but were considered probably benign and two other cancers were visible in retrospect at the site. Of 352 contralateral breasts without cancer, findings were negative or benign on PEM for 335 (95.2%; 95% CI, 92.2-97.0), which is more than MRI at 315 (89.5%; 95% CI, 85.7-92.4; p=0.002). The positive predictive value (PPV) of PEM-prompted biopsies (3/14 [21%]) was not significantly different from the PPV of MRI (15/54 [28%], p=0.58). On blinded retrospective PEM review of the 15 contralateral cancers, PEM findings for 11 (73%) were considered suspicious. CONCLUSION Contralateral cancer was found in 15 of 367 women (4.1%), with MRI showing 14 (93%). Eleven contralateral cancers (73%) were visible on PEM, but only three (20%) were recognized prospectively as suspicious. Lesions that are visible on PEM should be viewed as suspicious unless known to be benign by prior breast imaging or biopsy.

[1]  A. Giuliano,et al.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[2]  M. Morrow Magnetic resonance imaging in the breast cancer patient: curb your enthusiasm. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: findings from ACRIN 6667. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[7]  X. Varas,et al.  Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  N. Hylton,et al.  Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: Results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial , 2005, Journal of surgical oncology.

[9]  K. Czene,et al.  Incidence and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. , 2010, Radiology.

[11]  E. Merkle,et al.  MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  Jennifer B Kaplan,et al.  MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  M. Fernö,et al.  Tamoxifen reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer in premenopausal women: Results from a controlled randomised trial. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[15]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Bilateral primary breast cancer: A prospective study of disease incidence , 1984, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  D. Heron,et al.  Bilateral breast carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[18]  M. Schnall,et al.  Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  I. Fentiman,et al.  Prognosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[20]  J. Hayward,et al.  Family history and bilateral primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer? , 2008, Breast cancer.

[22]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  PET‐Guided Breast Biopsy , 2011, The breast journal.

[23]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[24]  A. Polednak Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: a population-based study of characteristics, method of detection, and survival. , 2003, Surgery.

[25]  G. Vlastos,et al.  Survival after bilateral breast cancer: results from a population-based study , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  C J Thompson,et al.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[27]  R. Warren,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  R. Meiss,et al.  Primary synchronous bilateral breast cancer: Epidemiological approach , 1988, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[30]  A. Zytoon,et al.  Breast cancer with low FDG uptake: characterization by means of dual-time point FDG-PET/CT. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[31]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  D. Narayanan,et al.  Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibility. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  E. Beckjord,et al.  Diagnostic Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[34]  Min Jung Kim,et al.  Bilateral synchronous breast cancer in an Asian population: mammographic and sonographic characteristics, detection methods, and staging. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  Nicola Miller,et al.  Bilateral breast cancer: analysis of incidence, outcome, survival and disease characteristics , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[37]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[38]  Jeffrey D Blume,et al.  Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. , 2010, Radiology.

[39]  D. Narayanan,et al.  Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. , 2011, Radiology.

[40]  E. Sickles Management of probably benign lesions of the breast. , 1994, Radiology.

[41]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[42]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. , 2002, Radiology.

[43]  E. Sickles Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis. , 1998, Radiology.

[44]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  D. Kopans,et al.  Occult Contralateral Breast Carcinoma Incidentally Detected by Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The breast journal.

[46]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[48]  T. Helbich,et al.  Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? , 2007, Radiology.

[49]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[50]  M. Lesser,et al.  Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1982, Surgery.

[51]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[52]  Masato Takahashi,et al.  The impact of bilateral breast cancer on the prognosis of breast cancer: a comparative study with unilateral breast cancer , 2005, Breast cancer.

[53]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[54]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[55]  Gray‐scale sonography of solid breast masses: Diagnosis of probably benign masses and reduction of the number of biopsies , 2007, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[56]  R. Prescott,et al.  The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours. , 2002, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[57]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of 771 patients with bilateral breast cancer: characteristics associated with overall and recurrence-free survival. , 2007, Clinical breast cancer.

[58]  M A Helvie,et al.  Women with breast cancer: histologic findings in the contralateral breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[59]  E Grabbe,et al.  Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. , 1999, Radiology.

[60]  D. Narayanan,et al.  Interpretation of positron emission mammography: feature analysis and rates of malignancy. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[61]  S. Groshen,et al.  Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up. , 1989, Surgery.

[62]  B. Asselain,et al.  Contralateral breast cancer: annual incidence and risk parameters. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[63]  E. Perez,et al.  In Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer, Screening MRI of the Contralateral Breast Detects Mammographically Occult Cancer, Even in Elderly Women: The Mayo Clinic in Florida Experience , 2010, The breast journal.

[64]  D. Salas,et al.  Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. , 2001, Radiology.