A recipe for effective participation rates for web‐based surveys

One way many universities have approached the process of better understanding and meeting the needs of their students is through student evaluations. The evaluation data provide not only diagnostic feedback but also useful information in terms of the quality of learning and teaching experiences. In an effective quality cycle, the data gathered are analysed and used to make improvements. This is often referred to as ‘closing the loop’. However, for any evaluation data to be of value an important prerequisite for ‘closing the loop’ is that response rates should be sufficiently high to be representative of the student cohort. This paper describes how a faculty within Monash University utilising only web based surveys developed a successful communication strategy to elicit staff and student participation in the unit (subject) evaluation process which achieved a response rate as high as 83.2%.

[1]  Sid Nair,et al.  Quality and Evaluation: A Universal System for a Quality Outcome , 2005 .

[2]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. , 1978 .

[3]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Closing the Loop: The Impact of Student Feedback on Students' Subsequent Learning. Research Report Series. , 1998 .

[4]  Robert W. Hanna,et al.  Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations , 2004 .

[5]  James Owen Drife,et al.  Student feedback , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  B. Fraser Science Learning Environments: Assessment, Effects and Determinants , 1998 .

[7]  Hamish Coates,et al.  The Development of an Extended Course Experience Questionnaire , 2003 .

[8]  Benjamin H. Layne,et al.  ELECTRONIC VERSUS TRADITIONAL STUDENT RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION , 1999 .

[9]  Graeme Bryant,et al.  Enhancing the GCA National Surveys: An examination of critical factors leading to enhancements in the instrument, methodology and process , 2006 .

[10]  Sid Nair,et al.  Evaluations and Quality: A Symbiotic Union for Evidence-Based Decision Making to Affect Change , 2008 .

[11]  Janet Leckey,et al.  Quantifying Quality: The importance of student feedback , 2001 .

[12]  Hamish Coates,et al.  Student Engagement in Campus-Based and Online Education: University Connections , 2006 .

[13]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Multi‐models of quality in education , 1997 .

[14]  S. Porter,et al.  Overcoming survey research problems , 2004 .

[15]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature , 2005 .