Future Perspectives and Challenges of Prostate MRI
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Bennett,et al. What Have Patients Been Hearing From Providers Since the 2012 USPSTF Recommendation Against Routine Prostate Cancer Screening? , 2017, Clinical genitourinary cancer.
[2] M. Terris,et al. Validation of the 2015 prostate cancer grade groups for predicting long‐term oncologic outcomes in a shared equal‐access health system , 2017, Cancer.
[3] M. Roobol,et al. Risk‐stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate‐specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow‐up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low‐risk prostate cancer , 2017, BJU international.
[4] Ximing J. Yang,et al. Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer. , 2017, European urology.
[5] A. Ross,et al. Genomic testing for localized prostate cancer: where do we go from here? , 2017, Current opinion in urology.
[6] P. Carroll,et al. Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Identification, Management, and Outcomes. , 2017, European urology.
[7] Mark S. Litwin,et al. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review , 2017, JAMA.
[8] T. Holland-Letz,et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Volumetric Morphology of PET-Positive Lymph Nodes Stratified by Tumor Differentiation of Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[9] M. Roobol,et al. Prostate cancer: Draft USPSTF 2017 recommendation on PSA testing — a sea-change? , 2017, Nature Reviews Urology.
[10] A. Patterson,et al. Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality. , 2017, European journal of radiology.
[11] S. Loeb,et al. The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men , 2017, Current opinion in urology.
[12] M. Cooperberg,et al. Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force ‘D’ recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging , 2017, Current opinion in urology.
[13] James S. Babb,et al. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection. , 2017, Radiology.
[14] Nathan Lay,et al. Detection of prostate cancer in multiparametric MRI using random forest with instance weighting , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.
[15] Mahul B Amin,et al. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2017, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[16] A. Rosenkrantz,et al. The Learning Curve in Prostate MRI Interpretation: Self-Directed Learning Versus Continual Reader Feedback. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[17] M. Parmar,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confi rmatory study , 2018 .
[18] C. Collins,et al. Metabolic heterogeneity signature of primary treatment-naïve prostate cancer , 2017, Oncotarget.
[19] A. Sidana,et al. Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[20] Jonathan E. Shoag,et al. National Trends in Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Volumes Following the US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening , 2017, JAMA surgery.
[21] Shyam Natarajan,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Underestimation of Prostate Cancer Geometry: Use of Patient Specific Molds to Correlate Images with Whole Mount Pathology , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[22] J. Tosoian,et al. Metastatic Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Bone Marrow Aspiration in an Elderly Man Not Undergoing PSA Screening , 2017, Urology case reports.
[23] S. Eggener,et al. Risk of lymph node metastases in pathological gleason score≤6 prostate adenocarcinoma: Analysis of institutional and population-based databases. , 2017, Urologic oncology.
[24] M. Roobol,et al. The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA , 2017, Nature Reviews Urology.
[25] A. Jemal,et al. Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[26] J. Epstein,et al. Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies , 2016, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[27] D. Margolis,et al. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[28] M. Schwaiger,et al. Simultaneous 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI Improves the Localization of Primary Prostate Cancer. , 2016, European urology.
[29] L. Marks,et al. Some prostate cancers are invisible to magnetic resonance imaging! , 2016, BJU international.
[30] Daan Nieboer,et al. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists , 2016, Histopathology.
[31] Samuel Borofsky,et al. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate gland: technical aspects. , 2016, Future oncology.
[32] Tayyar A. Ozkan,et al. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer , 2016, Scandinavian journal of urology.
[33] C. Zamboglou,et al. 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT Versus Histopathology in Primary Localized Prostate Cancer: A Voxel-Wise Comparison , 2016, Theranostics.
[34] Jonathan E. Shoag,et al. Reevaluating PSA Testing Rates in the PLCO Trial. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.
[35] H. Heinzer,et al. Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy. , 2016, European urology.
[36] Baris Turkbey,et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[37] B. Delahunt,et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[38] Katarzyna J Macura,et al. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. , 2016, European urology.
[39] David Y. Lu,et al. Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. , 2015, European urology.
[40] Baris Turkbey,et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.
[41] Baris Turkbey,et al. Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.
[42] Karen E. Burtt,et al. Computer Aided-Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI: A Technical Review of Current Research , 2014, BioMed research international.
[43] A. Ouzzane,et al. Multiparametric MRI-Targeted TRUS Prostate Biopsies Using Visual Registration , 2014, BioMed research international.
[44] Baris Turkbey,et al. Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion‐weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: Correlation with whole‐mount histopathology , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[45] Xavier Leroy,et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. , 2013, Radiology.
[46] Baris Turkbey,et al. Prostate cancer: can multiparametric MR imaging help identify patients who are candidates for active surveillance? , 2013, Radiology.
[47] M. Giger,et al. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. , 2013, Radiology.
[48] Andrew J Vickers,et al. Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[49] B. G. Blijenberg,et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[50] A. Vickers,et al. Novel approaches to improve prostate cancer diagnosis and management in early‐stage disease , 2012, BJU international.
[51] J. Gohagan,et al. Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[52] P. Choyke,et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation. , 2010, Radiology.
[53] Katarzyna J Macura,et al. MR-guided biopsy of the prostate: an overview of techniques and a systematic review. , 2008, European urology.
[54] P. Choyke,et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.
[55] Sheng Xu,et al. Closed-Loop Control in Fused MR-TRUS Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy , 2007, MICCAI.
[56] A. Levy,et al. Prostate Cancer: Local Staging at 3-T Endorectal MR Imaging—Early Experience , 2006 .
[57] N. Dubrawsky. Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[58] G. Murphy,et al. Prostate antigen: a marker for human prostate epithelial cells. , 1981, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[59] G. Murphy,et al. Prostate antigen: A new potential marker for prostatic cancer , 1981, The Prostate.
[60] D. Gleason. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.