Generalized framework for identification of indicial response functions from flutter derivatives of long-span bridges

Abstract The hypothesis that the Wagner and Kussner functions, conventionally used in the thin-airfoil aerodynamics, can also be used in the bridge aerodynamics, is often suggested in the literature. However, this assumption may lead to an inaccurate prediction of the buffeting response of bridges with increasing spans, which calls into question the validity of this assumption. This paper presents a generalized framework for the identification of bridge-related aerodynamic and aeroelastic indicial response functions (IndRFs) to simulate the buffeting response of long-span bridges under turbulent winds. For that, the direct relationships between IndRFs and experimental data of flutter derivatives are developed with the help of the Fourier transform, followed by the extraction of IndRFs through an optimization technique. Compared with the conventional Wagner and Kussner functions, the identified IndRFs exhibit the overshooting behavior, which can change the bridge aerodynamics significantly. To check the efficacy of the proposed framework, the numerical example of a suspension bridge is presented, and buffeting analysis is performed for two cases considering ① the identified aeroelastic and aerodynamic IndRFs, and ② the Wagner and Kussner functions. The simulation results are also compared with the field measurements, showing that the identified IndRFs are adequately reliable and unique functions for a bridge deck to simulate its buffeting response accurately.

[1]  Filippo Ubertini,et al.  Prevention of suspension bridge flutter using multiple tuned mass dampers , 2010 .

[2]  Teng Wu,et al.  Nonsynoptic Wind-induced Transient Effects on Linear Bridge Aerodynamics , 2017 .

[3]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  AIR FOIL AND BRIDGE DECK FLUTTER DERIVATIVES , 1971 .

[4]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Multimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo bridge , 1999 .

[5]  A. Kareem,et al.  Revisiting Convolution Scheme in Bridge Aerodynamics: Comparison of Step and Impulse Response Functions , 2014 .

[6]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Stochastic Methods in Wind Engineering , 1989 .

[7]  Filippo Ubertini,et al.  Computer Simulation of Stochastic Wind Velocity Fields for Structural Response Analysis: Comparisons and Applications , 2010 .

[8]  G. Solari,et al.  Probabilistic 3-D turbulence modeling for gust buffeting of structures , 2001 .

[9]  Virote Boonyapinyo,et al.  Advanced aerodynamic analysis of suspension bridges by state-space approach , 1999 .

[10]  R. Scanlan,et al.  INDICIAL AERODYNAMIC FUNCTIONS FOR BRIDGE DECKS , 1974 .

[11]  M. Shinozuka,et al.  Digital simulation of random processes and its applications , 1972 .

[12]  Khawaja Ali,et al.  Numerical simulation of buffeting response of long-span bridges in time-domain using Volterra based wind load model , 2020 .

[13]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  Role of Indicial Functions in Buffeting Analysis of Bridges , 1984 .

[14]  Claudio Borri,et al.  Time-domain buffeting simulations for wind–bridge interaction , 2007 .

[15]  Claudio Borri,et al.  Application of indicial functions in bridge deck aeroelasticity , 2006 .

[16]  Robert H. Scanlan Aerodynamics of cable-supported bridges , 1996 .

[17]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  CHARACTERIZING NONSTATIONARY WIND SPEED USING EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION , 2004 .

[18]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  A STUDY OF MODE COUPLING IN FLUTTER AND BUFFETING OF THE AKASHI-KAIKYO BRIDGE , 1998 .

[19]  A. Kareem,et al.  Efficacy of Averaging Interval for Nonstationary Winds , 2014 .

[20]  Tino Berger,et al.  Estimating Europe’s natural rates , 2011 .

[21]  Federica Tubino,et al.  Relationships among aerodynamic admittance functions, flutter derivatives and static coefficients for long-span bridges , 2005 .

[22]  Filippo Ubertini,et al.  Wind Analysis of a Suspension Bridge: Identification and Finite-Element Model Simulation , 2011 .

[23]  Pier Marzocca,et al.  Indicial functions in the aeroelasticity of bridge decks , 2014 .

[24]  T. Kármán,et al.  Airfoil Theory for Non-Uniform Motion , 1938 .

[25]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Simulation of Multivariate and Multidimensional Random Processes , 1971 .

[26]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Multi-mode flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo bridge , 1998 .

[27]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  Problematics in Formulation of Wind‐Force Models for Bridge Decks , 1993 .

[28]  Teng Wu Changing Bridge Aerodynamics under Nonstationary Winds , 2018, Structural Engineering International.

[29]  Herbert Wagner Über die Entstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln , 1925 .

[30]  Yaojun Ge,et al.  Indicial Functions for Bridge Aeroelastic Forces and Time-Domain Flutter Analysis , 2011 .

[31]  Hiromichi Shirato,et al.  Experimental extraction of indicial lift response function by an iterative correction method , 2017 .

[32]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  A methodology for the experimental extraction of indicial functions for streamlined and bluff deck sections , 2003 .

[33]  Anders Brandt,et al.  Aerodynamic Instability Investigations of a Novel, Flexible and Lightweight Triple-Box Girder Design for Long-Span Bridges , 2018, Journal of Bridge Engineering.

[34]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck sections , 2003 .

[35]  Francesco Ubertini,et al.  Indicial functions and flutter derivatives: A generalized approach to the motion-related wind loads , 2013 .

[36]  Luca Caracoglia,et al.  Artificial Neural Network model to predict the flutter velocity of suspension bridges , 2020 .

[37]  F. Y. Xu,et al.  System Decoupling Approach for 3-DOF Bridge Flutter Analysis , 2015 .

[38]  Alberto Zasso,et al.  Nonlinear modelling of aerodynamic self-excited forces: An experimental study , 2021, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[39]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Advances in modeling of Aerodynamic forces on bridge decks , 2002 .

[40]  Claudio Borri,et al.  Frequency- and time-domain methods for the numerical modeling of full-bridge aeroelasticity , 2007 .

[41]  G. Deodatis Simulation of Ergodic Multivariate Stochastic Processes , 1996 .

[42]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  Time domain modeling of self-excited aerodynamic forces for cable-supported bridges: A comparative study , 2011 .

[43]  Jong-Cheng Wu,et al.  Prediction of flutter derivatives by artificial neural networks , 2008 .

[44]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Bridge aerodynamics and aeroelasticity: A comparison of modeling schemes , 2013 .

[45]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.