Reproductive performance of sows selected for divergent social genetic effects for growth

Social genetic effects (SGE) are genetic effects of an individual that affect the phenotype of its social partners. We determined the reproductive consequences of selection for SGE on growth in pigs. To investigate the influence of social genetic effects on growth, gilts were divided into two groups based on their estimated SGE: positive SGE sows (+SGE) and negative SGE sows (-SGE). At the time of selection, gilts were contemporaries and similarly managed. We recorded the reproductive performance of the two groups based on parity until culling. Reproductive performance included the total number of piglets born (TNB), number of piglets born alive (NBA), average piglet birth weight (BW), coefficient of variation for birth weight (CVBW), age at first farrowing (AFF), weaning to estrus interval (WEI), and gestation length (GL). TNB was 0.5 higher for +SGE sows (13.8) than for -SGE sows (P = 0.03, SEM = 0.06), and NBA exhibited a higher tendency in +SGE sows (P = 0.07, SEM = 0.06). Positive SGE for growth was expressed at an earlier AFF (P = 0.04, SEM = 1.10), and shorter WEI (P < 0.01, SEM = 0.08) and GL (P = 0.03, SEM = 0.03). Collectively, the results of this study highlight the opportunities to improve litter size, the age at first farrowing, gestation length, and weaning to estrus interval using SGE.

[1]  P. Bijma,et al.  Indirect Genetic Effects for Growth Rate in Domestic Pigs Alter Aggressive and Manipulative Biting Behaviour , 2014, Behavior Genetics.

[2]  B. Kemp,et al.  Responses to novel situations of female and castrated male pigs with divergent social breeding values and different backtest classifications in barren and straw-enriched housing , 2014 .

[3]  M. Verstegen,et al.  Genetic correlations between lactation performance and growing-finishing traits in pigs. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[4]  S. Turner,et al.  Indirect Genetic Effects and Housing Conditions in Relation to Aggressive Behaviour in Pigs , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  B. Kemp,et al.  Reproductive cycles in pigs. , 2011, Animal reproduction science.

[6]  J. E. Bolhuis,et al.  Breeding amiable animals? Improving farm animal welfare by including social effects in breeding programmes , 2010, Animal Welfare.

[7]  R. Fernando,et al.  Genetic associations of sow longevity with age at first farrowing, number of piglets weaned, and wean to insemination interval in the Finnish Landrace swine population. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[8]  E. Knol,et al.  The Contribution of Social Effects to Heritable Variation in Finishing Traits of Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa) , 2008, Genetics.

[9]  Karin Meyer,et al.  WOMBAT—A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML) , 2007, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B.

[10]  M. Calus,et al.  Proceedings of the 8th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production , 2006 .

[11]  K. Stalder,et al.  Genetics of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in the Finnish Landrace and Large White pig populations. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[12]  T. Serenius Genetics of sow efficiency in the Finnish landrace and large white populations , 2004 .

[13]  S. Moeller,et al.  The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[14]  Greg M. Cronin,et al.  A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing , 2001 .

[15]  H. Quesnel,et al.  Influence of feed restriction during lactation on gonadotropic hormones and ovarian development in primiparous sows. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[16]  L. Rydhmer,et al.  Relationships between age at puberty and interval from weaning to estrus and between estrus signs at puberty and after the first weaning in pigs. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[17]  L. D. Young Reproduction of F1 Meishan, Fengjing, Minzhu, and Duroc gilts and sows. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[18]  J. Britt,et al.  Influence of stage of lactation, exogenous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, and suckling on estrus, positive feedback of luteinizing hormone, and ovulation in sows treated with estrogen. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[19]  K. Johansson Some notes concerning the genetic possibilities of improving sow fertility , 1981 .